User talk:Virgilisalive

Hello Virgilisalive, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Thomas More College of Liberal Arts have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HickoryOughtShirt?4 I am in no copyright violation. I will be turning the page back to my edits. I have gone through the text, all is free of any sort of copyright violation. If the edit is undone, I will have to report you or any other of the violating users to the Wikipedia administration. Virgilisalive (talk) 18:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your recent editing history at Thomas More College of Liberal Arts shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I am leaving this warning formally as I've already explained it also on my talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae I am in no copyright violation. I will be turning the page back to my edits. I have gone through the text, all is free of any sort of copyright violation. If the edit is undone, I will have to report you or any other of the violating users to the Wikipedia administration. Virgilisalive (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Virgilisalive, that sounds like a bad idea. Besides the copyright/close paraphrasing issue, your edits really are just blatantly promotional, and that in itself is, if one persists, a blockable offense. And if, as I think is likely, you have a conflict of interest, a block will prevent you even from improving the article within our guidelines. Please see WP:COI. Drmies (talk) 21:52, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Virgilisalive reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Virgilisalive, I recommend you take seriously the warning you got at WP:AN3. Besides doing what we consider to be promotional editing, you also edit warred by breaking the WP:3RR rule. Per the rules, your account could be blocked. Admins are giving you a break because you seem to be new. If you are also resistant to all education, we may run out of patience quickly. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston, Thank you. I would let you know that I have an intent on making certain edits to the page I have been working on. All of which are without violation of copyright or promotion. IN the future, I will care to avoid paraphrasing, but certainly there was and will be no violation of promotional editing. Yours, Virgilisalive (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's good that you have a plan, but any plan that makes you the sole judge of an appropriate edit may be a little optimistic. The best idea is to propose your changes on the talk page first and wait for feedback. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Where is the talk page that I should I propose my suggested edits? Yours, Virgilisalive (talk) 03:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Thomas More College of Liberal Arts. EdJohnston (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]