User talk:Viper Daimao

Welcome!

Hello Viper Daimao, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! As you haven't got one til now. Don't forger to sign your messages with the 4 tildes. Cheers and happy editing Lectonar 13:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that my IP address at work is shared by a few other people. This is because it is an aparently widely used proxy. A simple google search will prove this.

Sockpuppetry Claims

I have a minute to spare at work and am going to try to address some of the claims. The IP 64.154.26.251, which is my proxy address that I use at work, which is also used by thousands of other people as my google link above shows. My use of the word "yall" one time is just me trying to seem like a native Texan (which I am, though I am a Cowboys fan, not so much a Texan fan), when all you need to do is take my IP at home and do a whois search on it to see that it resolves to Houston. The fact that Eleem has used my conversations with 67124ect where we talk to each other like we are different people (because we are) as evidence for us being the same person since thats what someone who was the same person would do to try to act like two different people amuses me somewhat. Like a show that I can't remember the name of where they accuse this guy of having a drug problem but he didn't and he denies it. The boss accusing him says, "denial is the first sign of having a drug problem", to which he replies, "It's also the first sign of NOT having a drug problem". I realize how this can make sense to someone who is already convinced that I am a sockpuppet, therefore I have asked numerous times of someway to prove that I am not. This offer has been rejected as "interference chatter". Me asking for a way to prove I am real is "interference chatter"? This whole discussion is reaching the hights of absurdity to where one would think this is satire.

Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.

Sir Bedevere: And therefore...

Peasant 2: ...A witch!

Sadly that seems to describe this whole process that I have become an unwitting part of.

--Viper Daimao 16:41, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care how much proof you have. I still say you are me. Big Daddy 08:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully this puts to rest the witchunt. Finally, please read WP:NPA. It is being violated left and right by many. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:03, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I hope it will. I have always been more than forthcoming and eschewed much of my anonymity to combat these charges. If you have the time, could you present this evidence to the rfa page where I am accused? I am at work and am unable to edit any of the pages, much like the other people who stand accused. I will simply post my evidence when I get home later tonight if no one else does.

There's really no need to do so, but I will. I would reccomend using the email link to whoever blocked you and ask them to take a look at this talk page for counterveling evidence, or just wait out the block. There is no reason for you to get involved in the RFAr process at all, IMHO. Hipocrite - «Talk» 18:30, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. I actually did email Fred Bauder twice. Once when all this was starting and then again right after I wrote this. I tried to send one to Eleem who seems to be the main accuser but he hasnt set up his email.--Viper Daimao 18:46, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

64.154.26.251

yes, there's some accusations flying around. See here: [1]. The guy we are being accused of sockpuppets for seems to have a lot of enemies, so its tough to get help. But it's all so baseless it'll be worked out soon enough I'd think. 67124etc 01:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am in California. Anyway my IP is different. You apparently share that IP with 216.119.139.73 and Barney Gumble, which shouldn't be a problem except Big Daddy is also accused of using that IP. Though there's no proof of that last one apparently or we'd have heard it. 67124etc 03:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

concerning Harry Turtledove

If you find some neutral sources for your claims, go ahead.

I for one think that he's using these redundancies because he can't be sure if everybody has read all the books of the pertaining series; and by the way: Lectonar 13:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This type of censorship makes me sick

Vote to keep, show these hypocrites what's what, tolerance? ha, only when it's good for them--Diatrobica;l 23:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

Editor's contributions singled out for his faith, please help keep this notable article--172.150.77.35 16:47, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicity

You seem like a big Harry Turtledove fan. I work on the Turtledove wikicity and we need all the help we can get. Your help would be appreciated. Raylan 22:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

greetings

I'm new here so I thought I'd introduce myself to some of the people here--Chapline R Vine^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 23:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

Is your name really Viper? Cool!

Flip Merav 21 00:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board

Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nulearagecover.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nulearagecover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]