User talk:Viper 265

Open

July 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vedant (talk) 07:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 01:12, 24 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viper 265 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No verification sock puppet account This computer, is used by many people, therefore this IP address is open to several different people. Here at our local Occupation center! So it is unfair for you to falsely accuse me of multiply accounts

Decline reason:

We understand that locations such as libraries, occupation centre, etc may have multiple Wikipedia users. However, it's when those multiple users from the same computer edit the same articles in the same manner - often as a means of trying to gain new consensus - is where we must draw a line and link the accounts together. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viper 265 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes we our a group of fourteen military bloggers, and contributors for Wikipedia...and have no contact or connection to ANigg some of my colleague have been blocked cause of this previous user/ IP Address. I'm a fairly new contributor, and if I have committed some major offensive in my editing, I'm truly sorry. I did seek the help of BilCat as suggested to me, by my colleagues. Please Help us so that we may continue contributing to these articles

Decline reason:

Still sounds like this is intended to be a group account. Our rule is one user, one account. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Viper 265 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Let me reiterate, we are a group using one computer, each with his own account on Wiki. Again I have removed something on wiki with out a consense, i understand now, I'll make sure it dosen't happen again.Viper 265 (talk) 04:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's still WP:MEATPUPPETRY because you are editing the same thing with the same edits, and there is another account with the same name "viper" editing from that IP. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 04:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:300px-RAF.jpg.png

A tag has been placed on File:300px-RAF.jpg.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:600pxRAF roundel svg.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600pxRAF roundel svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hun Air force.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hun Air force.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:F-16 4th Gen Fighter.jpg

The file File:F-16 4th Gen Fighter.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]