Jump to content

User talk:Vioricamarin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Recent edits to E! (Europe)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, E! (Europe), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Johnny Test shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You're currently on your third revert of material on this page. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vioricamarin reported by User:MPFitz1968 (Result: ). Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Johnny Test. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bishonen | talk 09:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Hynden Walch. Changes and additions to nationality must be well-referenced in the article - in this case looks like false info was added as born in US and no Canadian naturalization was mentioned in article Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Johnny Test episodes. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty obvious season 7 isn't likely to happen, a 2-year-old 2013 Teletoon announcement for season 7 was not followed up with season 7 actually being broadcast. You added a table entry with a start date for season 7, that didn't have a reference, and a episode count, also unreferenced. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Johnny Test episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are continuing with the fantasy of season 7 starting to air in October 2015 and adding that bogus info to various articles. On the off chance that you actually believe this, please provide proof in the form a current reliable source reference that shows a season 7 episode scheduled to be aired. Absent that, the default assumption that you are attempting to add known false info to articles stands based on your refusal, likely based on your inability, to provide proof when requested. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Johnny Test. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism, as you did at List of Johnny Test episodes. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]