User talk:Vintagent

Image copyright problem with Image:Pdobeam.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pdobeam.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pdobrooklands.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pdobrooklands.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Vintagentbrooklands.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Pdobrooklands.jpg. The copy called Image:Pdobrooklands.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 06:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Vintagentridingsunbeam.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vintagentridingsunbeam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 15:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Vintagentbrooklands.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vintagentbrooklands.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 15:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1913VelocetteModelA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:1913VelocetteModelA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

DKW

I've reverted your changes about two-strokes in this article. Two-strokes have never been banned in the USA although environmental legislation has made it more difficult than it used to be to produce them. And the collapse of MZ was largely due to the major economic changes in East Germany after the fall of communisim, which bought hugely increased labour rates along with a huge number of other challenges that eventually proved too much for the company to cope with. Mighty Antar (talk) 23:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Self published sources

I suggest you read WP:RS about reliable sources, and then specifically the section on self published sources (WP:SPS). There is no way that your own personal blog can be used as a source for a Wikipedia article. --Biker Biker (talk) 08:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

See Talk:Motorcycle_land-speed_record#thevintagent.blogspot.com. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Roper velociped photos

Can you upload high res copies of any public domain or copyright expired photos from http://thevintagent.blogspot.com/2011/04/roper-steam-velocipedes.html to Wikimedia Commons and note your original source? I'd like to use them in the Roper articles. Thanks!--Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Adolphe Clément-Bayard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited André Pieyre de Mandiargues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Motorcycle fork, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Citing sources

When you preview your edits and go to the Notes or References section of an article and see red warning text, such as here, you know you've made a markup error. It's best not to click "Save Page" until you've resolved the errors.

Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Footnotes have instructions on how to cite sources. There are many different ways, and none is really the preferred standard, so it's hard to figure out. You might think you've got it and then you come to an article that uses a different style and you get lots of red errors on the page and you don't know why. I used Harvard style on the land speed record article and that just made it harder for others. I'm going to convert it to the more typical footnote style.

The easiest and most effective thing is to not try to use any HTML or Wiki markup at all. It isn't mandatory for you to use hyperlinked references. You can simply write:

Cork, Ireland ... Joseph S. Wright ... Zenith JAP ... (Barnes, F.W. (25 Feb 1931), "Letters to the Editor", Motorcycling)

just like that, putting the whole reference in parentheses right there. It's not fancy but it works. Just remember that if you use tags like <ref></ref> or {{Citation}} and whatnot, you have to work out the errors before you save the page.

Questions? Just ask! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Dennis: HTML isn't my native language, and I frankly struggle at times to learn the protocols. The reference protocols especially are confusing; why is it preferable, for instance, for the references I've added to appear in the 'notes' section rather than in 'references'? vintagent 20:22, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

It's only preferable for the sake of consistency, but there are many things that matter more than consistency. A while back I changed that article to the Harvard or parenthetical referencing style, and so (all else being equal) it's better to stick with one style within an article. My reason at the time was that I was citing many different page numbers from one book, and I thought that was more practical. But Harvard style is confusing, and I regret doing that. So I'm going to switch it back to the style of just using <ref>...</ref> tags and a {{Reflist}} tag at the end, rather than the use of {{Harvtxt}}.

The main thing is to always include enough information to identify the source: Title, Author, Date, Page, etc. If you do that, somehow, some way, then anybody else can come along after and sort out the formatting. Having a citation at all is more important than how, or whether, you format it. You can also add extended notes and explanations in your edit summary, and on the article's talk page, clarifying what you meant to do so it's more easily fixed. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:40, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Formatting units of measure.

According to WP:MOSNUM there should be a non-breaking space between numbers and a unit of measure such as mph. Furthermore it is recommended that you use the {{convert}} template to display both imperial and metric units of measure e.g. 123.4mph should be 123.4 mph, or better still use {{convert|123.4|mph|abbr=on}} to display as 123.4 mph (198.6 km/h). --Biker Biker (talk) 18:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Biker Biker (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Motorcycling Wikiproject

Welcome to the Motorcycling WikiProject. Hopefully you have a good time, start many new articles and can contribute lots to the existing ones as we need that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I've actually been an active wiki contributor/editor for many years, but have just joined the Motorcycling project! Vintagent

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Motorcycle land-speed record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to NSU and Triumph Motorcycles

Velocette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KTT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Commentary in articles

Can you tone down the personal commentary in articles, like this? Discussions belong on talk pages. Brianhe (talk) 00:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Roper steam velocipede. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.

• The pertinent talk page thread is Talk:Roper steam velocipede#Opinions about what is a true motorcycle. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Velocette KTT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shocks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roper steam velocipede, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobber (motorcycle), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob-tail and AMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Provenance of Dodge Tomahawks?

I'm working on a expanding the Tomahawk article at Draft:Dodge Tomahawk and I was wondering if any of your contacts know what happened to the supposed 9 copies of the bike that are out there. One of them seems to have landed at the Walter P. Chrysler Museum, but I have nothing else to go on. Have any changed hands or been put up for auction? Also, do you know if any of them has ever been tested to any degree? I don't believe there's any record of one running at Bonneville, and I've seen forum posts about an attempt to make a demo lap at Daytona by a professional motocross rider, but it immediately flipped itself over when he tried to go. There's just one video I've seen of one at a track, only going straight, and not seeming to exceed about 30 mph.

Thanks for any help you can offer. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Clifford Vaughs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Clifford Vaughs. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Cliff 'Soney' Vaughs. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cliff 'Soney' Vaughs – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 20:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clifford Vaughs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your edits to Royal Enfield

Are you happy that what you wrote accurately reflects the source material quoted in this change? This appears contrary to what I have in a 1996 magazine article, relative to the 1967 events, owning the rights and manufacturing spares from 1967 by Holder/Aerco. Looking at the two, it's unclear which is correct. The 1996 article contains an image (Motor Show-type which seems to corroborate their prose, and I am at a loss to explain why the article does not mention Holder/Aerco from 1967, if they were involved at that time. Thanks.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

The court record states clearly the owner of the trademark was Holder; it's well known his father purchased the rights and spares, along with those of Scott, Velocette, and Vincent. He lost his court battle as he was not trading as Royal Enfield Spares Co, but Velocette Spares Co, as he still does today. Was it right he lost the fight? Probably just - he wasn't making Enfields, after all!

I hope this answers your question! I've interviewed Davod Holder and done the research on his claims, and the court case was mentioned in several motorcycle magazines at the time...

No, I'm just as confused as I was previously (only just found the mag to refresh my memory). I don't have access to a scanner, but will send you large .jpg image files to see the content yourself. My concern is about Velocette purchasing the Royal Enfield spares in a coup by Bertie Goodman in 1967, and then continuing to retail them as an income-stream with figures quoted, not Mr Holder senior (David Matthew Scott Holder would be 14 years old at the time). It's vague but implies Velocette, not the Holders, financially benefited for three years from 1967 until the financial failure of Velocette. It also states the name of the business that bought the Veloce Limited assets from the liquidator and continued to manufacture parts, again not Holder or Aerco, and presumably Velo parts, February to July 1971 (info provided to the interviewer by Peter Goodman). It's The Classic Motor Cycle, but a quick skim shows no author attribute. I've checked the British public records for Holder, Velo and Vincent - nice address, Meriden Works! rgds,--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I must apologize about the date of Holder's purchase! Velocette did indeed purchase the Royal Enfield name and stock initially in '67, to make extra money selling R-E spare parts. When Veloce went bust in 1971, Holder purchased the name/spares, which must have included Royal Enfield. I can ask David Holder for clarification on the deal, but you are correct in your reading of that period. vintagent

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vintagent. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert P. McLauglin Jr (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Herbert P. McLauglin Jr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Giosue Giuppone) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Giosue Giuppone, Vintagent!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Fixed the article as much as I could.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Herbert P. McLauglin Jr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Herbert P. McLauglin Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Herbert P. McLauglin Jr

Hello, Vintagent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Herbert P. McLauglin Jr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. G13 account of Linguist111 (talk) 17:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vintagent. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Herbert P. McLaughlin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Herbert P. McLaughlin, Vintagent!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^{Babymissfortune} 11:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vintagent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)