User talk:VinDiesel22
Welcome
[edit]
|
File copyright problem with File:A Dangerous Man.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:A Dangerous Man.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball
[edit]Hi. Please review the official policy Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, particularly points 1 and 3, before you consider adding more yet-to-be-announced information to the Steven Seagal article. Predictions like that must be verifiable in reliable sources. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The article The Eagle Path has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Film hasn't been released, unsourced
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
[edit]Hi. Regarding your contribution to Steven Seagal, please have a look at Wikipedia's policy WP:CRYSTAL. Articles shouldn't contain speculative information about possible future events yet to be announced, without referencing reliable sources. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Steven Seagal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010
[edit]Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Steven Seagal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 23:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Icarus (film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dolph-ultimate.com/films/icarus.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
[edit]You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.Orphaned non-free image File:A Dangerous Man.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:A Dangerous Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)