User talk:Viiticus

Cookieman1.1.1 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Barnstar for the Orocovis.svg file

	SVGs - 'cause they're better
	My dad standing at the top of Gato, Orocovis, Puerto Rico loves Orocovis and your file. Good job! The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Sollars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rick Sollars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Sollars. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 17:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rick Sollars. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 04:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rick Sollars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Sollars, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Sollars (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taylor, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heritage Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lint errors on your user page

I edited your user page to fix lint errors. In three edits, you reverted my fixes, and then you made one more change. Information for "User:Viiticus" shows the lint errors on the page now, and I've added the tags involved.

Special:LintErrors/multiple-unclosed-formatting-tags	2	small, big
Self-closed tags	3	small (1), center (2)
Missing end tag	6	center (2), big (2), small (2)
Obsolete HTML tags	10	center (8), font (2)

Multiple unclosed tags are a problem especially for small and big tags, because if an unclosed tag is not in a table it leaks all the way to the end of a page. For example, series of unclosed small tags results in text getting smaller and smaller after each unclosed tag.

Self-closed tags: Some tags are allowed to be self closed. For example, <ref name="Foo" /> is short for <ref name="Foo"></ref>. Many other tags can't be self closed.  would mean , which does nothing, and it's a prohibited self-closed tag.

Missing end tags are obviously a problem because the effect of the tag keeps on going, which is not your intent.

Obsolete HTML tags are a problem because they are not officially supported in HTML 5 and eventually browsers may not support them.

The replacement markup for Some text is Some text.
 for X greater than 7 has always been treated as . The replacement markup is Some text but it is not guaranteed to work in all browsers.
The replacement markup for <center>...</center> is <div style="text-align: center;">...</div>. This does not work in all cases. There is special centering markup for many templates, for galleries, for entire tables, for table cells, and for images. For images, it's really easy, just include "center" (without the quotes) as one of the options in the image declaration.

Anyway, I fixed your lint errors. I had to make some guesses as to your intent with unclosed tags. If I closed an unclosed <big> tag, did you intend it to leak to the end of the page? I made what I thought were good guesses. Apparently you weren't happy with the results. So for now, I leave it to you to fix the lint errors on your user page. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Flag of Allen Park, Michigan.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of Allen Park, Michigan.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oakland County, MI maps

There are some glaring omissions on the four infobox maps that you added for the Oakland County cities of Berkley, Birmingham, Pontiac, and Southfield. On each of the maps, you forgot to add the city of South Lyon, as well as the villages of Leonard, Milford, and Wolverine Lake. Additionally, villages shouldn't be shaded, as this is reserved for the cities. —Notorious4life (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of Battle Creek, Michigan.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of Battle Creek, Michigan.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melodiya logo.svg

Not Your own work. Not trivial. Please, see w:ru:Файл:Логотип «Мелодии».jpg. Lesless (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Royal Seal of Minangkabau.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Seal of Minangkabau.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Preparatory High School

Hi. I'm afraid that an anonymous Wikipedia editor's word does not count as a reliable source. If you want to add or change things on the Taylor Preparatory High School, please cite a source that can be used to verify things. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boricua Popular Army

I noticed you replaced the image of the flag that was on the article with your own very different version. Note the article is marked "Good article" which means it was vetted and the information that is there is therefore correct. Why the big change in the flag design? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Eloquent Peasant: Hey! I left a reference in my file that goes to a link of a photo at a parade or some type of gathering displaying people carrying the the flag I added. Some quick Google image searches (though not always reliable) show the flag as green and red with a small amount of flags being sold as the same design as the old Wikipedia one. Correct me if I am wrong on which version is official or unofficial as my knowledge on the EPB is very limited ofc as I tend to stick to heraldry. Here are some examples to look at and lmk what you think: https://64.media.tumblr.com/996a9c76ebf464299b9fb8210d445960/1b457d66d0a75540-b6/s500x750/5a287b31c4c9c2d0168a8f3830cbf4f4e9740079.jpg http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lHk3JsmV_kI/UMqDOlv3xjI/AAAAAAAAAGs/Ih_paE_d2PE/s1600/Los_Macheteros_by_gercarloz.jpg https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/1013/18/ejercito-popular-boricua-macheteros_1_293dba3dae8c9171cb307b51365448c1.jpg

Happy editing and stay safe! -- Viiticus ^Loqui? 17:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this book, "Los Macheteros Wells Fargo Robbery And The Violent Struggle For Puerto Rican Independence" one sees an image used in their "underground materials" on page 13. The "gathering of people carrying the flag" and the other links provided here, I'm not sure are good WP:RS for determining the correct version of the flag. I think what was there before is best.

BTW, I reverted your .svg upload because your first .svg on the wikipedia article for Boricua Popular Army was an .svg similar to the image that was there. But then this image now is completely different. I asked in my revert summary if you can upload the file that you think is correct under a different / new name on Commons. Do you understand what I am saying? So then there will be two .svg files you created, the one that looks like the original image that was on the article and then a 2nd/ new one that you think is the correct version based on some people gathering carrying a flag. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another book where you can see symbol, of the machete, used by this group is here. Notice: The machete looks green, not red. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 06:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The cover of the book on Los Macheteros shows the red star. So I think we can safely surmise that their flag has a green machete with a red star per attached links to books written about them. --> Then we can surmise that the flag that was on the article before your change was correct. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 06:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my comments here to you, every instance of flag should say "symbol". See the talk page for the Boricua Popular Army --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 07:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Mount Clemens, Michigan.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Mount Clemens, Michigan.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

minor edits

Hey. I noticed you mark most of your edits as minor but they don't fall under the definition of minor edits. There's a real specific use for marking edits as minor. See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:Minor_edit#What_to_mark_as_minor_changes The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 05:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Ponce, Puerto Rico was reverted

Hello. I have reverted your edit of 21:00, 4 May 2023, at Ponce, Puerto Rico. The coat of arms (or city shield as some might call it) that you replaced has been there over 15 years (18:42, 1 November 2007). As such, and as I stated in the edit summary here, it has the tacit approval of tens, perhaps hundreds, of past contributing editors as well as all the current ones. It was a major change to the article, but perhaps you also had a major reason to change it. In that case, please discuss it in the article's Talk Page and achieve WP:CONSENSUS for the change first. Thank you.
Mercy11 (talk) 23:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]