User talk:ViennaUK

A belated welcome ...

Hello, ViennaUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Kralizec! (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Randolph Bresnik, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 01:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of couples with British titles in their own right

I have nominated List of couples with British titles in their own right, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of couples with British titles in their own right. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sandstein 17:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. AKeen (talk) 23:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory H. Johnson

Hi ViennaUK, I have reverted your edit to Gregory H. Johnson. I did so because you deleted a proper category. Greg Johnson is British, this is verifiable by checking his NASA bio, which is linked at the end of the article.--NavyBlue84 23:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because he was born in South Ruislip, Middlesex, United Kingdom, doesn't make him British. To qualify, he would have to fit one of the following two categories:

lex soli: By birth in the United Kingdom to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the United Kingdom
lex sanguinis: By descent if one of the parents is a British citizen otherwise than by descent (for example by birth, adoption, registration or naturalisation in the United Kingdom).

Neither is asserted in the NASA bio. He could have been born to tourists or expats temporarily residing in the UK. More info at British nationality law. Toddst1 (talk) 23:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ViennaUK. You have new messages at Navy blue84's talk page.
Message added 22:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Theodore Roosevelt

I just wanted to point out that the question you asked about the coat of arms of TR has engendered a spirited discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my! Seems like I stirred up a real hornets' nest here. I agree wholly and totally with what another user has written in the discussion, being "We are an encyclopedia for the general public, not only for those knowledgable about heraldry. If John Q Sixpack looks at an picture which he's told is the coat of arms of Theodore Roosevelt, how is he supposed to know that only the helmet and the roses and the motto and so on are actually the coat of arms? He sees the American flag, and the other embellishments, and he goes away with the firm idea that Theodore Roosevelt's coat of arms has the American flag in it [...] we have misrepresented a piece of information to him by including elements that are not actually part of the coat of arms [but] we have an obligation to our readers to provide an accurate representation of the blazon [...] Isn't our purpose to provide accurate information?" and that, I think, is also a good summary of Wikipedia's principles. What ever we do, we must not allow that the less informed might be led astray. Thank you. ViennaUK (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Ross (British Army officer)

Fascinating bit of info you have added there. Do you have a source for it? Toddst1 (talk) 23:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's from "A Complete Guide to Heraldry" by Arthur Charles Fox-Davies (published 1909), pages 113, 474, 593, 374. The book is also online and the passage on page 593 can be found here: http://www.archive.org/stream/completeguidetoh00foxdrich#page/592/mode/2up I hope this helps. ViennaUK (talk) 21:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore Assessment Request

I have reviewed the assessment request you submitted to WikiProject Biography for the Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore article, and determined that the article is not within the scope of WikiProject Biography. If you would still like an assessment of the article, I would suggest contacting one of the two WikiProjects listed on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Richard Taaffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viscountcy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Westminster Abbey Burials and Memorials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windsor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baron Arundell of Wardour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gurney family (Norwich), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Woodbridge, Maldon and Samuel Hoare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Gurney (1749–1809), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Barclay and Samuel Hoare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1st Phosgene attack

I like your additions to the article but didn't see anything about phosgene attacks on non-British troops or attacks before this one. Do you intend to add more material? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem! Just noticed it....Keith-264 (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kilmun Parish Church and Argyll Mausoleum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Campbell, 5th Duke of Argyll

Hi - Please can you not stop adding unsourced material to assessed articles. It is very dispiriting when some of us have worked very hard to get them past assessment. Thanks in anticipation. Dormskirk (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see why the information added to the above article is unsourced. I spent a long time writing about Kilmun as burial place of the Dukes of Argyll, and all information there comes with references. What I included in the above article was, as far as I remember, just links. ViennaUK (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You added "which he had extended" at the end of the article without a source. Sorry to be a pain but this was very obvious and I have had three articles downgraded that I have worked on (over several years) as a result of such trivial additions. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917)

Hello ViennaUK,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Esquivalience ^t 18:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917). Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Esquivalience ^t 18:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join MILHIST

Hello, ViennaUK, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Messines mines

Glad you liked the minor edits, apropos, is German your first language?Keith-264 (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, but the article is entirely based on the "Mines in the Battle of Messines" article I found on German Wikipedia. ViennaUK (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I've just been bigging you up as a bilingual. Do you want the list of mines to be made collapsible?Keith-264 (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mine warfare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hohenzollern redoubt 1916 wasn't a battle.

It should stay Hohenzollern Redoubt (1916)Keith-264 (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about "Action of Hohenzollern Redoubt (1916)"? I think it would be good to have some "battle word" in the title, although I'm not fussy which one. Maybe "attack" in analogy to Hulluch and Wulverghem? "Assault" maybe? Any ideas? ViennaUK (talk) 21:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not for us to apply a technical label since that is OR not NPOV and the October 1915 gig is called an action in James, E. A. (1924). A Record of the Battles and Engagements of the British Armies in France and Flanders 1914–1918 (London Stamp Exchange 1990 ed.). Aldershot: Gale & Polden. ISBN 0-948130-18-0. James based his book on The Official Names of the Battles and Other Engagements Fought by the Military Forces of the British Empire during the Great War, 1914-1919 and the Third Afghan War, 1919: Report of the Battles Nomenclature Committee as approved by the Army Council’, London, War Office, 1922. Keith-264 (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that seems to be a can of worms here! My take on things would be to (1) rename the 1915 article Action of Hohenzollern Redoubt (1915) and include a paragraph discussing that there are different labels attached to it in literature, (2) rename the 1916 article Attacks on the Hohenzollern Redoubt 1916 and describe that the article is about a group of attacks in March. What do you think? Thank you for including the full title of the James book. ViennaUK (talk) 06:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keith-264 (talk) 07:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Damned if you do, damned if you don't ;O) Attacks is also a technical term (see Other engagements) There are Affairs, Attacks, Actions and Battles in the Nomeclature Committee Report. Of course if we follow the British usage we can be criticised for Anglocentric bias, unless there's a source for French and German terms, hence the alternative foreign titles in some leads.... I had a look at the talk page of Loos 1915 last night and realised that there had been a conversation about the articles late last year, which you might find helpful. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the box with titles taken from OH 1916 I where there aren't any in James (p. 9). I'm still stuck with a new job which is taking up far too much time and frustrating my attempts to complete lots of unfinished Wikiwork. Bugger!Keith-264 (talk) 07:07, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for taking the time, particularly as it's precious! I shall have a play with all this info later. Just looked at http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/battle?showCookiePolicy=true for inspiration... Thx! ViennaUK (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

174th Tunnelling Company

added links pointing to Mametz and Somme

170th Tunnelling Company

added a link pointing to Bethune

172nd Tunnelling Company

added a link pointing to Somme

Chavasse family

added a link pointing to West Midlands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heuvelland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Heuvelland - Loker (Rodeberg).jpg|Landscape, with the village of Loker, as seen from the Rodeberg]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hill 60 Y

Nice idea. I had hoped to get the German side of Messines done today, now that my Wikimojo is coming back but the Babe's poorly so I've only got as far as fetching the book off the shelves; ah well....Keith-264 (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German side of Messines is absolutely a desirable thing to have. I seem to be doing more the geography of the Salient at the moment, to provide a home/context for the photographs I now got. Hope the Babe will get well soon! ViennaUK (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like the edits to Messines Mines and I haven't forgotten it; the Babe's recovering but she's still laid up.Keith-264 (talk) 22:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE source

Work in the field under the engineer-in-chief, B.E.F. : geological work on the western front (1922) Keith-264 (talk) 12:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see here

[1]Keith-264 (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tunneling companies UK

You and another user started making articles on the British tunneling companies. I'm assessing the backlog and realized that many of them were not as notable as others. Wondering if we could compile all of them in a list, and have separate articles on the companies where there is info to use. most of the articles had the same text with a few minor changes. I think a nice chart would suffice for those, and a list would be more useful that an entire slew of start-class articles, with a B article periodically. What do you think? Roger thought it would be good. I couldn't tell how wrapped up you were in Ozone's issues. He's not around to contribute though, so it would be you and me (and mostly you). :) Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your comment. I've got a lot of information on the Tunnelling Companies which I hope to put online at some time, alas I'm too busy at the moment. The beauty of having an individual article per Tunnelling Company is that it is relatively easy to add additional information to individual unit histories as such info becomes available. Who are Roger and Ozone? ViennaUK (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ozone had worked on a couple of them, and Roger is one of the emeriti coordinators at the Milhistory project. I've no problem with what you are proposing but I was thinking that it should be a list, and then full articles as info became available. auntieruth (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, instead of leaving the assessment blank, perhaps you'd like to enter them into the article writing contest? If you list them here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment#Requests_for_assessment someone will assess them and then you can enter them here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Contest#General_contest Even if you're not into contests, this also helps us keep track of new articles... auntieruth (talk) 16:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

New Zealand Tunnelling Company

added links pointing to Dugouts and Somme

184th Tunnelling Company

added a link pointing to Somme

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Astley Hall

Now that you have turned Astley Hall into a disambiguation page, there is something else you need to do. You need to edit all the articles that link to that page, listed at Special:WhatLinksHere/Astley Hall and relink them to Astley Hall (Chorley). Thank you. -- Dr Greg talk 00:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Hardinge, 1st Viscount Hardinge

Hi - Thanks for your edits to this article. Please can you ensure you always add sources to your edits as required by WP:SOURCE. In this instance I have done it for you. Thanks in anticipation. Dormskirk (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mining at Vimy

[2] Did I send you this.Keith-264 (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hagley Park

I see that you've moved Hagley Park to make room for a dab page. There are now a large number of articles pointing to the dab page. Part of moving a page is to tidy up after the move, but I can see no evidence in your edit history that you have started doing this. I trust you don't expect other editors to tidy up after you, so can I please suggest that you get onto this work? Same as Astley Hall above, so this shouldn't come as a surprise to you. Schwede 66 07:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Schwede 66 17:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hagley Park, Worcestershire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clubhouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tunnels Sah! Thahsands of 'em!

The Routledge Atlas of the First World War Gilbert, M. Routledge, 1970 & 1994 0-415-11933-2 p. 51 has a rather good diagrammatic map of the tunnelling areas on the British Western Front 1915–1916. Keith-264 (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hagley Park, Worcestershire

I have turned the article you created into a redirect. Hagley Park refers to the dear park. The Hall, stables, church and cricket ground are not in the park. The estate is usually referred to as Hagley Hall (as are most estates eg Blenheim Palace). Also there was a copyright violation as you did not attribute the text you copied from the Hagley Hall article (See WP:Copying within Wikipedia on how to attribute such copies in future). If you look at the Hagley Hall article. If you wish to discuss this further I suggest that we do it on Talk:Hagley Hall. -- PBS (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884), ViennaUK!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've just upgraded the citations by adding titles & citing the specific books - hope this is OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Tunnels Sah! Thahsands of 'em!

Tunnellers 2009 by W. Grant Grieve and Bernard Newman.Keith-264 (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Keith! And have a merry Christmas! ViennaUK (talk) 18:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O))Keith-264 (talk) 18:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright material removed

I have removed most of your addition to William Hackett, as it was copied from mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/the-real-hero-tunnellers-of-world-war-165110. All content must be written in your own words. Let me know if you have any questions. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trewan Hall

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Trewan Hall a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Vivian family (of Trewan Hall). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Talskiddy (talk) 09:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your notice. I'm totally unfamiliar with the technical side of also keeping a page's edit history. In case of Trewan Hall and the Vivians, I split the articles because there was awesome detail about a very important family, except that the article said little about the building itself. So it seemed sensible. That doing so removed you from the edit history is something I neither intended nor would want to do. Please accept my apologies. Can you help with the requested moves, please? Kind regards, ViennaUK (talk) 20:08, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884)

The article William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He was the son of a peer and a minor church figure (canon). Neither establishes notability and there is no mention of works or achievements doing so.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 10:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Henry Lyttelton (1820–1884) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 07:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mines on the Italian Front (World War I), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the WWI tunnel warfare articles

Many thanks for the splendid articles on mines in World War I: Mines on the first day of the Somme, Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917), and Mines on the Italian Front (World War I). I noticed the latter when it was added to this automated search which I had set up recently (hoping to find and encourage areas of WWI editing). Can I ask if there are plans for an overview article on tunnel warfare in World War I, that would fit at the head of Category:Tunnel warfare in World War I? Maybe Tunnel warfare#World War I is enough? I was also looking at World War I to see if mining or these tunnel mines are mentioned and couldn't find anything. With WWI being such a vast topic area, I suspect people have to go to individual areas to find links to the articles. But would like to see more links leading people to these articles (it is difficult to tell which incoming links are from templates or from running text within an article). Also, should tunnel mine redirect to tunnel warfare? Carcharoth (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits

Sorry to be so severe with your edits on Poasschendaele and Tactical Development but you seem to have got the wrong end of several sticks re: Wynne. You managed to wikilink names already linked too. do you have a User:Keith-264/common.js ? If you do and have importScript('User:Ucucha/duplinks.js'); you can scan a page for duplicate wikilinks. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 23:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving a note. I've realized where I got my counting wrong, it was by misinterpreting the role of the main battle zone (Grosskampffeld). Thanks for correcting my wobbly writing. ViennaUK (talk) 18:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At least you read the bugger! Since you've been going through the 3rd Ypres pages, I think I should mention that there's a WP somewhere about not putting pics, maps etc on both sides of the text, hence some of my edits of your edits. I prefer such items on the right margin only but other people disagree and there's some layout convention, about the subject of the photo pointing towards the text. If squaddies are moving left to right, the pic should be on the left (which means I'd rather not use the pic at all).... The definite article the seems to me to be misplaced with Flandern I Stellung et al. because it's a title but again that seems more like my aesthetic preference than a WP. We write the prose we write and for ages I've been trying to be as laconic as possible. I think I'm getting the hang of it, because I tend to draft sentences in my head now rather than write them and revise them every time I look at the article. The Wikiedit I save has as few adjectives and pronouns as possible but I still find that I commit solecisms like serpentine sentences and wayward commas. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"dressed in brown suits"

I can't resist putting that bit in. ;o))Keith-264 (talk) 08:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant find - I like it! ViennaUK (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

[[3]] Hello Vi, found this the use of embedded links for inline citations is deprecated the other day, thought you might like a look. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of World War I flying aces from Austria-Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somme ce's

I think I just blotted out one of your edits when I resolved an edit conflict, apols. I must have written this before a German-speaker pointed out that German terms are capitalised unless they've been imported into English. We don't need to repeat the French, German and English names for the Lilot though. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ovillers-la-Boisselle in World War I page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Y Sap mine has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, ViennaUK. Y Sap mine, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Y Sap

Have you been enjoying yourself? ;o)) Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS Template:Infobox military operation you might want to consider this for your mining articles? Keith-264 (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Shall have a look. Best wishes, ViennaUK (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 1st Canadian Tunnelling Company page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Actions of St Eloi Craters

Moved your work to a new article space that has the details of the Great War operations under Local operations December 1915 – June 1916 and added material from the OH, more to come. Returned Sint Elooi to a location article OK? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, shall have a detailed look soon! I've done Spanbroekmolen in the meantime, please feel free to add to it with overground operations. Best, ViennaUK (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should have mentioned that the gig has The in the title, apols for the confusion. I've managed to clear quite a bit of the backlog from my sandboxes so decided to revise the Bluff and St Eloi to fit the Local operations December 1915 – June 1916. For once there's quite a bit of detail from German sources in the OH to add. Keith-264 (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for chopping off the "The"! ViennaUK (talk) 13:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ViennaUK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hooge

The OH has it separate from Mount Sorrel so I was thinking about a page and stumbled on Hooge in World War I so I've added a bit of narrative. Weren't you thinking about a comprehensive article on the Ypres Salient a while back? I see that there is the beginning of an article already.Keith-264 (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise how much material there was on Hooge in the OH and divisional histories. I think that it would be better to combine the events and mining sections to avoid duplication. Any thoughts? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good question... When I started Hooge in World War I, I did it mainly to avoid filling Hooge, Ypres with too much detail on World War I and to allow it to exist as a location article. If you think that the underground sections of Hooge in World War I should be combined with the other events there, I have no objection as long as no detail gets lost in the process. Best wishes ViennaUK (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quite agree, it's the duplication I was worrying about but if you keep your eye on it I can't go far wrong. Keith-264 (talk) 12:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ comprehensive article on the Ypres Salient: Yes it would be handy to have such an article, but I'm not sure if it is a priority. Taking into account all the detail that's available (just look at List of World War I memorials and cemeteries in Flanders, and that's nowhere near to being complete) I'm reluctant to embark on such a massive enterprise myself at this stage. ViennaUK (talk) 10:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know that feelin'. Since we've got so many articles now, I had in mind a hub article linking the articles with a summary, rather than anything elaborate but then again, just about every brief article I start balloons....;O)) I'll have to check on what material I've got on the reasoning for having the salient at all, because that would be the most important section. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 12:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't done much as I've had two funerals to go to but I'll be pressing on tomorrow.Keith-264 (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear of the nature of your two commitments today. I've seen you've been busy. Good work! ViennaUK (talk) 20:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Y Sap mine

Hello! Your submission of Y Sap mine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EdChem (talk) 12:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of L'îlot de La Boisselle

Hello! Your submission of L'îlot de La Boisselle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 02:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond on the nominations page right away. It has been over two weeks. If we do not hear from you by the end of the year, the nomination will likely be marked for closure. I do hope we hear from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Y Sap mine

On 3 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Y Sap mine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Y Sap mine was an explosive planted under German trenches before the Battle of the Somme in World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Y Sap mine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Y Sap mine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vimy mines

[4] Seen this? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oooooh! Thank you! ViennaUK (talk) 09:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ViennaUK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ViennaUK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chavasse family

Hello ViennaUK! Would you be able to go back and edit Chavasse family to remove the symbols? I can work out that * means born and † means died, but some of the others (eg ∞) I can't work out. If I could work it out I'd change it myself! Thank you, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 17:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm RenatUK. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mikhail Lermontov, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Renat 12:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

No. 49 Squadron RAF

added a link pointing to Operation Buffalo

Vickers Valiant

added a link pointing to Operation Buffalo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Wittering

Thanks for contributing to the article RAF Wittering. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Marham

Thanks for contributing to the article RAF Marham. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Boyce, Baron Boyce

Thanks for contributing to the article Michael Boyce, Baron Boyce. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Fisher

I have the article on Anna Fisher up for review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anna Lee Fisher/archive1. If you could drop by with some comments, that would be appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Baron Morris. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Morris (disambiguation) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Baron Morris (disambiguation). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Morris barons moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Morris barons, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Morris barons in the United Kingdom

Hello, ViennaUK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morris barons in the United Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Morris barons

Hello, ViennaUK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morris barons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Morris barons in the United Kingdom

Hello, ViennaUK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Morris barons in the United Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Category:Crematoria by country

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Category:Crematoria by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chavasse family (United Kingdom) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Chavasse family (United Kingdom) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]