User talk:Videojournalist

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Videojournalist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Talk:The Other Boleyn Girl (film). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Readings (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Brandon Schantz

A tag has been placed on Brandon Schantz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 14:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Ninomiya

Hey. I've removed your request from the third opinion page. The discussion you linked to was at least five months old (Feb 2008). If there's no discussion, then there's nothing on which someone can comment. If you were trying to get someone to comment on this revert, well, that's a different story. You should at least wait until there's some discussion - and some disagreement in that discussion - before asking for a 3O. Having said that, I have to agree with Georgiamonet on that. I also happen to know that the text you inserted is identical to that on Emily Carlson‎, and you could at least switch it up a bit. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response, I think I cross-posted on your own talk page.--Videojournalist (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)