User talk:Victorygin1138

Victorygin1138, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Victorygin1138! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rocketmen (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocketmen (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocketmen (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buy Now: The Shopping Conspiracy (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buy Now: The Shopping Conspiracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 21:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CoconutOctopus

hello - thank you, I will look for and add additional sources. Is Time Magazine not a reputable, independent source? Victorygin1138 (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time is absolutely a reliable source, yes! But you'll need more sources than you have currently to show significant coverage.

Also, in its cirrent state, the article is very short and could do with a bit of expansion before publishing. I'd suggest having a look at other articles about documentaries to get an idea of the sort of format and content required. CoconutOctopus talk 22:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CoconutOctopus understood and thank you! I'll take a look and try to update tomorrow, I really appreciate it. Victorygin1138 (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]