Jump to content

User talk:Victoria caspare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadiyah-Nicole Green (June 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Victoria caspare! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hadiyah-Nicole Green, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Air on White (talk) 04:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Victoria caspare! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Innisfree987 (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 08:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, touching base because I saw and also was concerned by this draft. My guess is that rather than being the result of a close connection to the subject, it may have been generated by a large language model like ChatGPT. Editors need to exercise serious caution when incorporating LLM-generated material, as you are still responsible to make sure anything you add to Wikipedia adheres to all WP policies. For example, you must check to be sure any LLM-generated copy is free of copyright violations; that all the claims made are actually verifiable in the sources (or even that the sources cited exist, because ChatGPT has been shown to fabricate them); et cetera. This is especially important in a case like this when editing a biography of a living person, since libel is a concern. Best practice is also to disclose in an edit summary that this is the origin of the material. Please read the essay at WP:LLM before you use LLMs in WP editing. Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]