User talk:Vicentemovil
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Vicentemovil! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 11:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Answer: Burgundy cross
[edit]Hi. Sorry for answering late. I forgot to share the sources that claims that the Cross of Burgundy have been used as flags of the Viceroyalties of New Spain and Peru.
These are the sources:
- Camacho Vargas, José Luis (2021). Los símbolos patrios y las fuerzas armadas (PDF) (in Spanish). Mexico City: Cámara de Diputados. pp. 56–57. ISBN 978-607-8812-00-4.
Fue justamente durante el Virreinato de la Nueva España que se dio el primer antecedente de un pendón utilizado como una suerte de bandera nacional. Éste consistía en un paño blanco sobre el cual estaba la cruz de Borgoña en rojo y en cuyos extremos se tenía el escudo de armas de la Ciudad de México, formado por un águila posada sobre un nopal. Esta representación igualmente servía más para identificar a la Nueva España que para dar identidad a sus habitantes.
- Cervera, César (23 June 2021). "Perú saca a relucir la bandera de la Cruz de Borgoña en homenaje a su pasado español". ABC (in Spanish). Madrid.
Durante 282 años, el Aspa de Borgoña fue la bandera del Virreinato del Perú , un territorio que comprendía originalmente casi toda América del Sur, incluyendo Panamá y algunas islas de Oceanía. Cuando la República del Perú declaró su independencia el 28 de julio de 1821 su extensión era menor, pero seguía gozando de una importancia capital en las estructuras económicas y administrativas del Nuevo Mundo.
2x2leax (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Black Legend map
[edit]Hi Vicentemovil, I have started a discussion on the talkpage regarding the map issue. Please don't revert in the meantime, the policy of wikipedia is that changes which are challenged does not have the consensus of users, and so should be discussed on the talkpage and resolved without edit-warring. Would be interested to hear your reasons for changing the map on there. Boynamedsue (talk) 10:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- I would like to give you this opportunity to self-revert to remove the university map you have reverted into the text. The discussion on the page clearly indicates there is no consensus for it. I don't want to have to go through the whole, warning and administrators' noticeboard route. Boynamedsue (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also, please self-revert the word "fictitious" from the description of the engraving, there is no consensus for it. Boynamedsue (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please revert yourself by tomorrow. Boynamedsue (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
ANI Notice- Legal threats
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Boynamedsue (talk) 20:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 21:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)