User talk:Vice regent/Archives/2020/August
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vice regent. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam and blasphemy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naskh.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Your recent activity
I have integrated or reverted some of your edits. I hope the summaries I left will be exhaustive about the motivations. As for why I gave a look to your recent activity, according to what I have seen your edits tend to be more destructive (by removing sources or sentences) than constructive and often silence points of view that do not conform to your personal opinion. --Grufo (talk) 03:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
'''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|'''<font color="Black">talk</font>''']]</sub>
: VR talk
to
'''[[User:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>[[User talk:Vice regent|<b style="color:Black">talk</b>]]</sub>
: VR talk
—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I changed that.VR talk 10:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Great, thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GirthSummit (blether) 18:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- This really is just a heads-up - I'm not implying you've done anything wrong, but you need to be aware. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. If you ever see me violate WP:BLP, call me out and I'll correct my behavior ASAP.VR talk 18:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Just look at this
Nonie Darwish's twitter account makes for some err... "interesting" reading. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I've been doing some digging too. According to Media Matters for America, which users agree is a reliable source, Darwish called Obama a “political Muslim”. Citing this claim, among others, Senator Kevin Parker wrote a letter questioning the "veracity and credibility" of statements made by Darwish. In a press release, Senator Parker said "...Nonie Darwish, an individual unqualified to speak on Islamic jurisprudence and has a long record of using racist and incendiary language..."
- I think some of this, when sourced to reliable sources, should be made clear on our article on Nonie Darwish.VR talk 21:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- There's some interesting criticism in this 2018 journal article, describing her as being part of a "sharia scare industry" and "Worlds apart from acknowledging Muslim Americans as compatriots or fellow human beings, Darwish’s shariah scare industry portrayal transforms Muslims into anti-American automatons." According to the article she also stated that “[muslims] are incapable of feeling compassion toward non-Muslims. Acknowledging compassion to non-Muslim oppressed minorities is grounds for apostasy. A Muslim must stay hardened and unyielding” This is definitely veering into Alex Jones territory. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hemiauchenia Ok, first of all how did you find that? What search engine did you use? JSTOR?VR talk 21:54, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think I typed "Nonie Darwish criticism" and it was on the 3rd page, it's also on google scholar. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Got it.VR talk 22:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think I typed "Nonie Darwish criticism" and it was on the 3rd page, it's also on google scholar. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting, the person who wrote the MMfA article is Max Blumenthal, who now runs the deprecated, The Grayzone. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't know that. So would an article authored by Blumental in MMfA be considered a reliable, secondary source? VR talk 22:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- The article has an audio file (which still works after all these years) which matches the transcript, so yes it's fine. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Our perennial sources entry Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Media_Matters_for_America seems to be outdated or in contradiction with this discussion closed by ToThAc. Is it simply the case that no one updated the perennial list? VR talk 22:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- The article has an audio file (which still works after all these years) which matches the transcript, so yes it's fine. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't know that. So would an article authored by Blumental in MMfA be considered a reliable, secondary source? VR talk 22:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hemiauchenia Ok, first of all how did you find that? What search engine did you use? JSTOR?VR talk 21:54, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Recent edits to Ruhollah Khomeini
Hi, do you find the recent edits to Ruhollah Khomeini to be in line with the TP consensus? --Mhhossein talk 14:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the earlier message
And, keep up the good work. I don't really have much to add in the various disputes going on right now other than repeating myself. May have something to add on the concubinage article, as I note that some authors like Kecia Ali are quite badly quote-mined, but that too is a repetition. Take care and keep cool. It's not always easy. 39.37.128.59 (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, and please keep showing up to wikipedia :). VR talk 13:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Takbir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Hood shooting.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
WP:DRN
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a dispute in which you are involved. --Grufo (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'll respond there soon.VR talk 01:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- The DRN has been closed because there has been less than 24 hours of discussion.VR talk 15:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Azhar University, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dean and Nathan Brown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)