User talk:Viajero/Archive 8

Harry Magdoff

Nobs01 again! I'm going to post a rewrite. 172 | Talk 10:56, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I doubt that the work's done. I'm expecting a fight with Nobs01, who has been contaminating many other articles with his defamatory personal conspiracy theories. This user needs to be watched very closely. 172 | Talk 13:01, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I might need some help on Communism with Ultramarine. Also, let me know about other articles ready for quick rewrites like Harry Magdoff. 172 | Talk 14:45, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! I didn't know that! 172 | Talk 19:13, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian Unlimited, as it were (beforehand too anyway). El_C 19:31, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it. Worse, Nobs01 has a sidekick now, TJive... John Kenney has already worked to keep their conspiracy theories out of the FDR article. We might want to get his help in dealing with this whole "category." SlimVirgin might also be very helpful. I'm not aware of an editor who deals with "original researchers" more effectively than Sarah. 172 | Talk 17:52, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ultramarine

We need some relief from this user. If you have time, please take a look at the 3RR violation that has yet to be enforced. Thanks. 172 | Talk 15:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

I am not using any sockpuppet accounts and would really appreciate it if you and your fellow comrades stop insinuating that I am. J. Parker Stone 11:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When I left the last message, I did not see the evidence of sockpuppet usage. Perhaps I spoke too soon. 172 | Talk 02:20, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i only use Trey Stone and 64.7.89.54 when I'm accidentally logged off. i happened to see said anon's edits because they were on my watchlist. J. Parker Stone 02:25, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Assorted Stuff

Do you know what happened to the category "Peruvian Terrorists?" I noticed that it dissapeared, but don't know why. I added Belunde, Garcia, and Fujimori to the list, as I felt they fit the definition, and I noticed that it suddenly went away. Perhaps rather than get in a fight about it, everyone would rather just see the category deleted.

Also, do you know anything about Barry Seal? His article is only a stub, and you are the kind of guy who would know a lot about him. Descendall 01:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just saw that Peruvian Terrorists was removed, CfD. Missed the debate on that one. Descendall 06:01, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hey, thanks for the polite response in the email. On a side note, I'd really appreciate it if you editted back Pol Pot, as the current version is simply inaccurate in terms of dates. If you object to the other edits that I originally made in that section I can discuss it on the talk page -- same with the other articles we were RVing on before I got injunctioned. J. Parker Stone 03:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CFD

Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 July 15#Category:Peruvian terrorists. It wasn't that hard to find. -- Viajero | Talk 09:19, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

OK. Understood. Question: How do you find a category that was deleted?--AAAAA 19:11, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Porgy & Bess FAC

Hey Viajero. Alexs letterbox apparently submitted Porgy and Bess at WP:FAC a week ago, so it's now at that crucial stage. Any input you have would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Porgy and Bess/archive1. Cheers.--Baron Larf 01:59, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Pol Pot

done. the big thing that got me on that article was my inability to edit the date inaccuracies. J. Parker Stone 20:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ortega

Thanks for the note. I've been noticing POV creep on both the Ortega article and the Sandinista article but haven't had time to get into them. The POV in the Sandinista article consists mostly of Trey Stone sprinkling in repetitious and somewhat inaccurate references to Marxist and Cuban influences. It's true that the Sandinistas were influenced by both Marx and Cuba, but he makes it sound like they started out without any Marxist ideas and those got snuck in later. I think he also exaggerates the Cuban influence and makes it sound like Nicaragua was simply a client state of Cuba. There is also some language about Sandinista human rights abuses that is poorly-sources and excessive, and Trey chopped out some perfectly accurate statements about U.S. interference in Nicaragua elections since 1990, replacing it with the unsourced and untrue claim that the U.S. has not exerted any influence at all.

With regard to Daniel Ortega, I think there is a place for some of the assertions that have been added lately. Lots of people (including many Sandinistas) are unhappy with Ortega's heavy-handed control of the FSLN, and there has been quite a bit of understandable speculation (although there is no proof) that he had a hand in the murder of Carlos Guadamuz (whose name is misspelled as Guadamus in the recent edit). However, it is over the top and POV pushing to simply label Ortega a "dictator." He led a revolutionary movement that overthrew a dictator and is the first example in a very long time of a revolutionary who came to power through force of arms but left voluntarily when he lost an election. He's not a saint, but the Sandinista-bashers shouldn't be allowed to portray him and the FSLN as devils either.

I have a friend who lived in Nicaragua for the better part of a decade who might be interested in doing some editing on those articles. I'll give her a call and see if I can get her hooked on Wikipedia. ;-) --Sheldon Rampton 11:03, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Magdoff

Viajero: Can you cite point by point which sources you are challenging? Thank you.nobs 17:38, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Be advised: a vote to Merge was the result --> Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Conspiracy allegations about Harry Magdoff; in good faith, there was a compromise understanding to limit its contents to the essential paragraph on the Harry Magdoff article. nobs 22:02, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin needed

Could you please take a look at [1] He has since become even more of a disruption since my post. Thanks. 172 | Talk 17:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, you might also want to take a look at this VfD. 172 | Talk 19:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Why is it that the best defense which can be culled by you in support of massive deletions of material is to repeatedly state that I and others are engaging in such acts as "McCarthyite smears"? It is not productive and it establishes nothing but the fact that as an administrator you do not feel you need to adhere to certain Wikipedia rules, like on personal attacks. And yet, my "McCarthyite smear" represents the most extensive and constructive effort to verify the material put forward that has been made so far....--TJive 20:13, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

Keetoowah

Hi Viajero: I took your advice and opened Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Keetwoowah. —Theo (Talk) 11:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nobs01 strikes again

Old version:

Victor Navasky, editor and publisher of The Nation, a publication which has itself had two correspondents identified in the VENONA decrypts, has written an editorial highly critical of the interpretation of recent work on the subject of Soviet espionage:

Nobs01 version[2]:

Victor Navasky, editor and publisher of The Nation, which has been referred to as a "Kremlin-directed Stalinist mouthpiece" evidenced by having two of its own correspondents identified in the VENONA decrypts, has written an editorial highly critical of the interpretation of recent work on the subject of Soviet espionage:

My RFA

Thanks again, Viajero, for nominating me for adminship. Please let me know if I can help with any administrative responsibilities, or if you have any problems with the way I use the admin tools. Cheers. --Baron Larf 00:33, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Helen Hunt

Thanks for finishing up the edits on the Helen Hunt article. I would have finished it up but I had to leave for a little while. Dismas 21:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RfArb

In case you didn't noticed, Theo Clarke opened an Request for Arbitration for Keetoowah about ten days ago: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Keetoowah. Two ArbCom members have voted to accept it, but much to my astonishment, two others have voted to reject it. I know you were thinking along these lines awhile ago -- care to add your voice? It would be helpful. I am contemplating adding a comment or two as well. -- Viajero | Talk 20:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a few comments on the topic. Kelly Martin 21:24, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

I have filed another request for Arbitration, this one against Ultramarine; you commented on his RfC. Septentrionalis 17:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Netherlands

On 9/11 (ominous date!) there's going to be a wikimeet for to create an nl.wikimedia. OMG, that's sunday! Could you spread the word a bit? Thanks! :-) Will you be coming too?

(and sorry for spamming this to a few folks) Kim Bruning 20:51, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Magdoff

Sorry to bother. I have posted a Request for Comment for the pages Talk:Harry Magdoff and espionage and Talk:Harry Magdoff. ENdless revert wars and edit conflicts. Input welcome. --Cberlet 22:19, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Monnet

Please could you let me know the reason for removing the section http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jean_Monnet#His_marriage

Fairuz

Hi traveller. Do you have any idea how to deal with the anon reverting Fiaruz article ? Cheers -- Svest 10:59, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nobs Redux at Talk:VENONA project

Someone, not I, has consolidated the discussion over the Venona documents and how to represent them (prompted by the tect written by Nobs on many pages) onto a single page: Talk:VENONA project. I hope you will join us in trying to resolve many of the issues that keep cropping up across Wikipedia in this matter. Thanks. --Cberlet 12:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keetoowah Arbitration case

Hello,

The Arbitration case against Keetoowah that you contributed to has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah/Evidence.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LPMCOTW

Hi,

have a look at Wikipedia:Leftist Parties and Movements Collaboration of the Week. --Soman 20:45, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fairuz

Great job again. I didn't notice that bulk addition of Oct. 20th. I believe that the anon is obsessed with Fairuz. -- Svest 21:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up™}[reply]

Mar del Plata Summit of the Americas

Hello again! Would you be interested in keeping on eye on this article? We can expect a lot of big news coming out of the Summit in the next few days. 172 | Talk 00:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links by email. I was looking forward to making the article on the summit as comprehensive as it should, but not the topic seems to be totally overshadowed by the events in Peru and France. 172 | Talk 07:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion

I page which is part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war (of which you are listed as a member) is up for deletion. It is The Left and Opposition to War, you can see its entry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Left and Opposition to War. It would be helpfull if you could add your opinion.--JK the unwise 12:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting times...

Nice to see your name crop up on my watchlist; it's been a while. Yes, I think we can look fwd to a flurry of editing activity on various Peru-related articles over the coming months. Anyone who reads that Miami Herald article and Googles for "la cantuta massacre" or "barrios altos massacre" gets pointed here. (Btw, the herald is registration only, and I've never bothered, but I caught the same story (or at least a similar one) on some similar site: byline 'Tyler Bridges'?) Cheers, –Hajor 18:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please vote to merge and redirect Islamofascism to Neofascism and religion...

... which is where it belongs. Vote here: [3] BrandonYusufToropov 21:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting frivolous Jewish categories

Hi Viajero: Kindly take a look at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 November 25#Sub-Categories of Jewish people. This area needs some cut-backs again. IZAK 03:38, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration for User:TDC

Hi, you don’t know me but we have had contact with a mutual person, User:TDC.

I got your username from the Requests for comment/TDC-2[4] or the Requests for comment/TDC[5]

Currently there is arbitration pending on User:TDC. [6]

I welcome and encourage your comments on the arbitration page.Travb 01:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Important AfD

Hi. If you have time please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of modern day dictators. I'm a bit worried that the main protagonist for the keep side is threatening to reverse the long-established consensus against creating historical categorization schemes on Wikipedia based on editors' original research. If you are interested, arguments against generating such a list have been stated and restated over the course of several years at Talk:List of dictators. Thanks. 172 20:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dare I ask you to look at another of these forest fires?

Hope you can make your best call here. [[7]] BrandonYusufToropov 22:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Anti-war project, push to get a featured article b4 Xmass

February 15, 2003 anti-war protest, an article which is part of the WikiProject Anti-war of which you are listed as a member, has been recently rated A-class by the Version 1.0 Editorial team (see here) This means that it is considered to be of good quality. The Anti-war project has yet to achieve a featured article but with a little pushing I feel we could get this article up to FA standards. To this end I have put the article up for peer review, if you could help make this a brilliant article that would be much appreciated. Please give your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/February 15, 2003 anti-war protest/archive2 or on the article's talk page. Fingers crossed for a FA before Xmass.--JK the unwise 13:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coleopterists

Saw your early (2003) note on Coleopterists (reads Nice but.. ) I didn't start this page but I've added quite a bit to it.See what you think. Also glad of a view of my Timeline of Entomology Best wishes from Ireland Notafly 16:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lilian Cristina Aya Ramirez

Do you know anything about Lilian Cristina Aya Ramirez? The entry claims that she is a Venezuelan politician close to Hugo Chavez who was part of the Venezuelan branch of the Shining Path. It seems to me quite possible that this is just some absurd claim by a Venezuelan right-winger who wants to paint Chavez up as a Senderista, which he obviously isn't. But I've never heard of Lilian Cristina Aya Ramirez, nor have I ever heard of the group that the page claims is the Shining Path branch. --Descendall 23:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen

Hello, I would like to know if you could go over the Carmen page. I've added a lot of info, but from the FAC request, I've found my writing style to be lacking brilliance. I think as an experienced Wikipedian, you might be able to help me. --Alexs letterbox 10:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Magdoff

I just learned that Harry Magdoff passed away, I was going to edit his page here (considering the nonsense about him before User:Nobs01 finally got banned for a year) when I saw you had changed it already.

I also looked at your last 50 edits to see how active you were and saw #50 was in September. I guess you've become disillusioned with Wikipedia, something that happened a while ago for me. I am currently creating a corpus of articles with a GFDL or similar license on wikis like Red Wiki, Anarchopedia, Dkosopedia, Demopedia, Infoshop's OpenWiki and Sourcewatch. Thus I have none of the headaches associated with Wikipedia, although none of these have the momentum of Wikipedia. Ruy Lopez 01:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rigoberta Menchu.jpg

Hi Viajero. Is there any chance you could provide a fair use rationale for Image:Rigoberta Menchu.jpg? --Nick Boalch^?!? 11:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're the guy who put in the "disinfo" about priests roaming the streets of post earthquake 1755 Lissabon hanging heretics. Kudos! "Rectify article submit ante filing"! He who controls the past controls the future!

Rv War "List of political parties in Peru"

User:Soman has started a revert war in the List of political parties in Peru article. He made a bunch of stub articles (rarely more that one sentence and none with sources) for a bunch of, for the most part, small relatively unknown political parties and put them on the thread. User:Messhermit reverted it and asked to talk it out in the talk page and then the war began. You can see it all in the page history. I ask that some action be taken.-Jersey Devil 05:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not initiate a revert war. Messhermit did. A study of the history of that page will clarify that. He also made a proposal on the talk page which, IMHO, has no grounds in terms of wikipedia policy (merging articles relating to separate political entities into a single article). The main source of the articles, which of course needs to be added in the respective articles, is from a document from ONPE, [8]. I also object to the statement that most of the parties would have been small or unknown. The list includes many parties that played an important role in a certain political context, but folded long ago. Also, there are many short-lived, but not necessarily unimportant, alliances between political parties included. --Soman 12:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject anti-war, Article improvement drive

February 15, 2003 anti-war protest an article from the WikiProject Anti-war, which you are listed as a member of, has been nominated for the Article Improvement Drive (by me ).

It is an article about a day of much importance both to the history of the anti-war movement and to general discussion of the Iraq war. With a little work from experienced editors it could gain FA status. If you would like to see it improved please vote for it at Make "February 15, 2003 anti-war protest" the subject of an Article Improvement Drive--JK the unwise 13:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page deletion

Why was User talk:Davenbelle deleted? It is my understanding that we don't delete user talk pages, because they represent community contributions, may contain warnings, and do not belong to the user. Thanks, -Will Beback 00:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I asked because another editor, user:Paroxysm, cited your action to justify the deletion of his own former talk page, user talk:24ip, which contained various old warnings, etc. After posting this note I found that Wikipedia:User page is surprisingly permissive. I'd heard various admins and others make comments indicating it wasn't permitted, and left a note on Wikipedia talk:User page asking for clarification, but hadn't received a response. You didn't do anything wrong, apparently, nor did user:24ip, but I think that the guideline should be clearer. Cheers, -Will Beback 07:27, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Holmes

You commented on the talk page of this article. I'm hoping to get it featured soon and would welcome your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 21:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Avelino Cáceres

The Wikiproject:Peru current collaboration is on Andrés Avelino Cáceres. I've already gotten it out of the stub stage but wouldn't mind some help on it. Feel free to add info on the page if you have time and are interested. Thanks, bye.-Jersey Devil 22:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chilean coup of 1973

I'd be interested in your opinion at Talk:Chilean coup of 1973#Differentiating the deposement from the coup. - Jmabel | Talk 06:33, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date links

Since you have taken an interest in date links. Please be kind enough to vote for my new bot application. bobblewik 20:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Input for next Wikiproject Collaboration

Seeing as we are almost done with the Andrés Avelino Cáceres collaboration and March is coming up. I'd thought that I should inform you and the other members of WP:Peru that you can add your thoughts on what you think the next project collaboration should be on at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru#Collaboration.--Jersey Devil 21:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

Please comment on my rfc Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jersey Devil--Jersey Devil 21:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Sand

I am suspicious of all the recent material from the "KGB archives." All intelligence agencies boast about their exploits--and often it is mostly hyperbole and rumor. Don't have the book, but some of the edits seem to state as fact what should be identified as unverified claims from a partisan source.--Cberlet 14:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandinista article

I realize you don't have much time at the moment, but I would like to draw your attention to an edit yesterday by TDC to the Sandinista article. [9] Given earlier evidence of his shabby "scholarship", notably with the Neruda article, these edits need to be rigorously examined. Could you lend a hand? Viajero | Talk 09:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"After a Cuban reorganization of the FSLN structure and tactics?" What utter crap. This looks like TDC is again using a tactic he has used before: writing a version that even he knows is not neutral, by way of staking out a negotiating position. Which, in my view, is a waste of everybody's time, including his.

It will probably be Sunday before I get a chance to take a real look at this. And, I should add, it's not a topic where I can really claim to be an expert, though I certainly know quite a bit. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My my Viajero, you have been busy rounding up a posse havent you? No matter, I am more than willing to talk things thorugh. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 01:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for my suggestions; I made them almost a week ago; but then, as far as I can see, neither you nor TDC has proceeded at all, either in the article or the talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 05:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another date links proposal

Hi, you expressed an interest in link policy in the past. You may wish to see the proposal at: Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#linking_of_dates and vote whichever way you think is best. Thanks. bobblewik 18:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Badawi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Badawi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Template:Anti-war topics up for deletion

Template:Anti-war topics is up for deletion. Please weigh in on the discussion. Thanks! SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo Galeano

Hi there! There's copyright problem with article Eduardo Galeano. Could you take a look at en:Talk:Eduardo Galeano? You might whant ot collaborate. Thanks alot, Mariano(t/c) 08:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for

The move/revert war issue for Israeli Apartheid has been referred to arbitration. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Move and revert warring at Israeli Apartheid /SlaveCrixus 16:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Apartheid (disambiguation)]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. /SlaveCrixus 16:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland!

Beste,

Er wordt een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland georganiseerd. Er is al een voorlopig programma met lezingen van Jimbo Wales, Kurt Jansson en vele anderen, workshops en discussies over bijvoorbeeld de Easy Timeline, pywikipediabot en de toekomst van wiki[p/m]edia. Het zou me leuk lijken als je ook kon komen! Meld je snel aan op de inschrijfpagina, want we moeten snel weten hoeveel mensen er ongeveer komen! Stuur deze uitnodiging vooral ook door naar anderen die geïnteresseerd zouden kunnen zijn door {{subst:user:Effeietsanders/wcn}}~~~~ op hun overlegpagina's te plakken. Hoe meer zielen, hoe meer vreugd. Met vriendelijke groet,
effeietsanders 22:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Anita_O'Day.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anita_O'Day.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

add pic to german wikiweb

Hello my name is stefan and I would like to know if you can to add the pic on my german page, please? I am the author on this page, but I have a little problem with admins, because admins canceled my pics. 217.230.236.65. 23:41, 21. aug 2006 (Germany) | Sorry, my Username is Stafanio Batolomeo; Grace Bumbry [10]

Congratulations

for Image:PrestigeVolunteersInGaliciaCoast.jpg, among others. Excellent and rare thing to have photographs of historical events. Rama 18:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Chávez

Things seem to be heating up at Martha Chávez. Truth be told, they are getting much more hot that I would have wished. I mention this because I know that you know a great deal about modern Peruvian politics, and may wish to weigh in. --Descendall 03:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although you have no made a single edit to this article, you somehow have become the topic of the greatest debate on the talk page. It's truely odd. You might want to check it out. --Descendall 19:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. To be honest, I never really saw myself as sticking up for you. Sticking up for common sense, I suppose. Unfortunately, Shining Path and Alberto Fujimori seem to be in total chaos right now. AAAAA seems to be convinced that Soman and I are actually Shining Path cadre or something, even to the point of inserting information about "The Sweden Cell" into the SL article (I think Soman is Swedish). Perhaps it's a good thing; the day that a bunch of ultra-violent fanatical Maoists like the Shining Path can be accused of sitting around editing Wikipedia will be the day that Peru will be able to breathe easy. --Descendall 19:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab case

Following your recent edits to Alberto Fujimori, would you be interested in joining the mediation on the Talk:Alberto Fujimori/Mediation page? If so, could you add your name to the list. Thanks, Addhoc 12:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Messhermit

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Messhermit, which I just filed. --Descendall 08:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now it's at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Messhermit. --Descendall 00:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you?

Where are you? I'm at the point of thinking of adding you to the list of missing and possibly dead Wikipedians. Wikipedia needs you, come back! --Descendall 04:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Parry

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Robert Parry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Smeelgova 16:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Jasper (Vision Quest) Article Scheduled For Deletion

Hi there, You have shown through your Wikipedia contributions that you're a fan of Matthew Modine and quite possibly the 1980s movie "Vision Quest". I created an article on actor Frank Jasper who played the villian, Brian Shute, in the movie. I've also included information about what Dr. Jasper is doing now. Many people have wondered through Wikipedia and Imdb whatever happened to him, and I've tried to put this information out there for everyone. Unfortunately, some people think the article should be deleted for whatever reason. If you loved the movie as much as I did, please go to this link and voice your support before the article is deleted. Thanks a lot. I would appreciate your support very much.

Mister Jinxy 20:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i own every image

i own every image i upload i'm giving it away all my images have been deleted, this sucks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zaguiar (talk • contribs) 05:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Eastman School of Music

Hi, I was wondering (and I hope I'm not mistaken that it is you who wrote the article on the Eastman School of Music) where you found the US news report which had the rankings of music schools in the US and whether it is still available for viewing. I would be very interested in taking a look at it and would greatly appreciate any help you could give me in finding it. Thank you in advance, Sorouthorn 03:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Markiyan

A new task force could use your expertise!

Hi Viajero, you're an editor I admire a lot, so I thought I'd draw your attention to the following. Benzocane 19:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are being recruited by the Environmental Record Task Force, a collaborative project committed to accurately and consistently representing the environmental impact of policymakers, corporations, and institutions throughout the encyclopedia. Join us!

Anarchism (anti-capitalist)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anarchism (anti-capitalist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Anarchism (anti-capitalist). скоморохъ 00:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Klein viene a Perú, niteresado en contactarse con wikipedistas

esto: http://groups.google.com/group/l-plug/browse_thread/thread/e9b48fa6a21d0ef3

Saludos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.232.173.29 (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blogsphere

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blogsphere, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

lacks notability, no third party sources and reads like an ad

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 16x9 (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:How the Current events page works

Hi Viajero,

I came across Wikipedia:How the Current events page works for the first time and was very impressed with the ideas there, and I see that you were the person who first inserted that content. Where did you learn that stuff? It's really interesting. Is this the sort of thing one learns in journalism school? If so, I feel like I would probably like to become a journalist :)

thanks for teaching.

Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 19:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS I see from your user page that you were a contributor to Les Troyens. Thanks -- I'm a big berlioz fan and I've relied on that page in the past! Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 19:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Viajero! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 327 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Fred Weir - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jane Slaughter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Doug Ireland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rafael Sánchez Ferlosio - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Félix Lavilla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Barsamian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carolyn Watkinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Andrew Cockburn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Christa Ludwig.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Christa Ludwig.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Félix Lavilla

The article Félix Lavilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009, fails WP:MUSICBIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Barrios Altos matanza.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Barrios Altos matanza.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:María Elena Moyano.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:María Elena Moyano.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —mono 00:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Contra4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Contra4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nylon (magazine)

The article Nylon (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NN magazine

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Yorker cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Yorker cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technological utopianism

Hello Viajero. In light of the fact that you created the Technological utopianism article. Could you weight in the disputes raging on the Talk:Technological utopianism page. --Loremaster (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in following up your message. Will have a look at the talk page and try to help out. Viajero | Talk 17:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If could also help revamping the article with scholarly sources, it would be very much appreciated. --Loremaster (talk) 20:10, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:

Loremaster says he is:

"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."

Loremaster wants people to:

"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."

Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."

81.151.135.248 (talk) 11:53, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB[reply]

LOL
Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

--Loremaster (talk) 00:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Moncada barracks.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Moncada barracks.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Barsamian

The article David Barsamian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't seem to meet notability requirements and the only source is a blog. Google news articles only mention him in passing. Google search returns poor results

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. N^oformation ^Talk 10:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Rat Pack.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rat Pack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 13:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Moncada barracks.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moncada barracks.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Dutch-to-English

Re:Dutch-to-English

I would be grateful if you could check quality of google translation (my understanding - National Bank of Belgium agreed to distribute images of the banknotes it has issued using the same rules as euro banknotes) - please reply on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BEL-500f-rev.jpg Bulwersator (talk) 06:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question

I was wondering how I can join the Peru Wikiproject page.Do I just need to contribute?? User:Critviz

I have added you to Missing Wikipedians

Just to let you know (I am supposed to - this is what it says). Ottawahitech (talk) 00:04, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improving translation support

Hi Viajero! We are testing some new ideas to provide better support for the translation of Wikimedia projects and we want to hear from the community.

If you are interested in trying some prototypes and exchange your impressions, you can fill the participation form. Once you have filled the form, we'll contact you to perform a short testing session (less than 30 min. in total) during next weeks.

Thanks

Pginer (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LionShare

The article LionShare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced software article of unclear notability, tagged for multiple issues since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of an article

Hey Viajero, can I ask you for a favour. Do you like to complete the Dutch article of Twist, Germany. Beginning is done, all other details are on the English page. Just if you are having time would have also a second article Erdöl-Erdgas-Museum Twist --95.88.99.149 (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Teresa/Mother Teresa (Adam Carr's original text) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mother Teresa/Mother Teresa (Adam Carr's original text). Since you had some involvement with the Mother Teresa/Mother Teresa (Adam Carr's original text) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JMHamo (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Viajero. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Viajero.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francesco Maria Piave small.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Francesco Maria Piave small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]