User talk:Verdena900

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Catherine Spaak and People and Religions – Terni Film Festival. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello Verdena900. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Oreste Crisostomi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Verdena900. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Verdena900|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 174.254.192.241 (talk) 19:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oreste Crisostomi (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dennis Brown was:

I think he barely squeaks by as "notable" based on the references, but the article has some issues. Reference 1 is a blank page, and you have a lot of external links in the body of the article, something you want to avoid. Ref 4 isn't cited properly. In the filmography shouldn't have the external links inline, use a proper "external links" section in the bottom of the article instead. Fix all that and hit me up on my talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oreste Crisostomi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oreste Crisostomi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Verdena900! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oreste Crisostomi has been accepted

Oreste Crisostomi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't guarantee that someone won't try to take it to WP:AFD, but in my judgement, the subject is notable enough for inclusion (barely) and the sources are ok. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note, when you leave a message on a talk page or discussion page, you need to sign your posts. All you have to do is put four tilde marks, like this ~~~~ and it will automatically sign your name and time stamp it. Pretty much every comments (but not article edit, of course) needs this so we know who is saying what, and when. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 17:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Verdena900 (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]