User talk:Venustruth

Venus Nicolino

Please understand this subject is up for deletion. The previous unreferenced version, with numerous WP:BLP violations, which you restored here, is why the article was put up for deletion. Please keep the improved version otherwise more contributors are almost certain to vote delete.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undid a third time, please stop this, and discuss on the talk page if you have issues with the article. Crow^Talk 17:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Be warned: now that you have made the same revert three times: if you do it again you could be blocked for WP:Edit warring. --MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to ask nicely. What you are writing is defamatory and false. You are falsely accusing someone of being addicted to drugs. That is per se defamation. Please understand that I am Dr. Nicolino's attorney and we will be filing legal action if this does not immediately stop. I can also guarantee to you that we will continue to undo this change every time you make it. So you can do the right thing and stop the libel, or you can force me to file a lawsuit against you and keep undoing this entry. One way or another, I have been hired to make sure that you do not continue to defame Dr. Nicolino. Thank you.

The Wikipedia article makes no such accusations. It simply refers to actual, published information that makes references to her own statements. As a lawyer, you know that referring to her own statements can never be defamation, per se or otherwise the panda ₯’ 10:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI, WP:NOSHARE, WP:NLT

It appears from your edits that you may have a conflict of interest with Venus Nicolino, that you may be using a shared account (use of the term "we"), and that you have been making borderline legal threats, a please be careful to conform to the relevant Wikipedia policies on these subjects linked here: WP:COI, WP:NOSHARE, WP:NLT. CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Venus Nicolino. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. DMacks (talk) 03:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]