User talk:Vensatry/Archive 28
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Vensatry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
DYK for List of unusual dismissals in international cricket
On 12 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of unusual dismissals in international cricket, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mohinder Amarnath is the only player to be dismissed for both handling the ball and obstructing the field in One Day International cricket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of unusual dismissals in international cricket. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 08:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
ITN credit
On 14 April 2015, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jayakanthan, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
ThaddeusB (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- [dead link] Archived page —Vensatry (ping) 16:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Hello Vensatry, thank you for your improvement of the article on Jayakanthan! It was extremely low on sourcing before, which meant that we could not highlight on In The News the passing of this great Tamil poet. Your extensive work on sourcing means that we can now recognise him in this way. Thank you and continue your good work on improving this encyclopedia. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot :) —Vensatry (ping) 17:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
DYKs
I want to ask whether newly promoted (FA, FL or GA) can be submitted for DYK?—Prashant 07:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Only GAs can be nominated, that too with in a week after its promotion. For FA/FLs, we have TFA/TFL. —Vensatry (ping) 08:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
That means there is no chance to newly promoted fls? Any other ways to add DYK to articles?—Prashant 08:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the encouraging comment. Shahid • Talk2me 17:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
1 award two name
I think there is a misunderstanding about her awards win particularly Filmfare. I have seen Filmfare Awards in my childhood from 2003 to 2012 (Now I'm not at home nor have time). I have seen who got what. Lara, Priyanka, Ayesha Takia, Kangana, Vidya, Deepika all got the same awards twice. But, they had only one award at the end of the day. It was also present in Balan's page (which I removed 2 yrs back), It was also present in Kangana's page. You should watch this video where Deepika and Ranbir are holding only one award in their hand, posing for the filmfare magazine. If she had won two awards she would have two trophies in her hand. Which is not the case. You may ask @Krimuk90:, he had once told me to remove it from Padukone's page. I hope it helps.—Prashant 12:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Holding only one trophy in her hand => Only one win - How can someone arrive at a conclusion like this? What if somebody wins three awards in a ceremony? Okay leaving that aside, why do you think think this award shouldn't be listed here? —Vensatry (ping) 17:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
- Traffic report: Furious domination
Let's continue
Why would Krim reports Prashant twice on SPI? Abd keeps on blaming his work while krims work also have issue. Daan0001 (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Yeah for a short while though :). I feel we could put up some still from his acting days. From movies such as Sabapathy, Nam Iruvar, etc.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 02:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I think stills from Sabapathy can well be added since they are in PD. But do we have the same? —Vensatry (ping) 06:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2003 Cricket World Cup Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2003 Cricket World Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film)
On 21 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Sivaji Ganesan won Best Actor for Veerapandiya Kattabomman at the 1960 Afro-Asian Film Festival, becoming the first Indian actor to win in that category in an international film festival? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 21:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
A long-overdue barnstar to one of the brilliant editors on Wikipedia. And, for your outstanding work on Cricket lists.. —Prashant 06:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of 2003 Cricket World Cup Final
The article 2003 Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2003 Cricket World Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
- In the media: UK political editing; hoaxes; net neutrality
- Featured content: Vanguard on guard
- Traffic report: A harvest of couch potatoes
- Gallery: The bitter end
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veedu (1988 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandhyaragam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Enthiran - First Superstar FA!
Great news! Enthiran is promoted! My first FA success! Hooray! — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
DYKs
Thank you for your comments on the DYKs. Please talkback as I will be taking a two-week break from Wikipedia. Thank you.—Prashant 09:41, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- It has passed?. Also, Navv is waiting your response on Fashion award list DYK.—Prashant 08:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- I cannot proceed further as I'm not the original reviewer —Vensatry (ping) 09:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2003 Cricket World Cup Final
The article 2003 Cricket World Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2003 Cricket World Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for National Film Award for Best Lyrics
On 29 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Film Award for Best Lyrics, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Tamil poet Vairamuthu is the most frequent winner of the Indian National Film Award for Best Lyrics, winning six times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Film Award for Best Lyrics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 12:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2015
- Featured content: Another day, another dollar
- Traffic report: Bruce, Nessie, and genocide
- Recent research: Military history, cricket, and Australia targeted in Wikipedia articles' popularity vs. quality; how copyright damages economy
- Technology report: VisualEditor and MediaWiki updates
Pride of Tamil Cinema free preview
Unnaipol Oruvan (1965 film) is well detailed in Pride of Tamil Cinema; and I also believe that the free preview will not last forever (I think the free preview will vary each day with the pages), so make the best you can of it. PS: The chapter Karnan contains a lot of my writings. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- I happened to see some stuff about the film. Thanks for reminding me. We'll jointly take it to the DYK in a couple of days. —Vensatry (ping) 12:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Use all you can. I hope the data is enough for a possible FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Category:Filmfare Best Tamil Movie Award winners
Category:Filmfare Best Tamil Movie Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK for 2003 Cricket World Cup Final
On 5 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2003 Cricket World Cup Final, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ricky Ponting's 140 not out in the 2003 Cricket World Cup Final is the highest score by a captain in a World Cup final? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2003 Cricket World Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2015
- News and notes: "Inspire" grant-making campaign concludes, grantees announced
- Featured content: The amorous android and the horsebreeder; WikiCup round two concludes
- Special report: FDC candidates respond to key issues
- Traffic report: The grim ship reality
Doubt
Regarding population a city like Guntur and Nellore were expanded and nearby villages were merged. The new population is based on 2011 calculations by summing up the city population with the merged villages population. So, can we mention the updated one or the 2011 official old data?--Vin09 (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for dropping in. But I'm not clear about what you're exactly looking for. —Vensatry (ping) 18:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think I got the answer by checking our conversation User_talk:Vensatry/Archive_23#Population. My doubt was Guntur city population was increased by merging surrounding villages, so the population was increased. Same for Nellore. As per your statement, which you told me long back, I added these two places population in the info boxes. So, I asked is it correct to add them or we should go back to 2011. As far as I know, the municipality added the villages population to the corporation based on 2011 census. Anyway thanks for responding.--Vin09 (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- If we have a reliable source for the updated figures (for expanded areas), it's fine to add it. Else, I'd advise you to stick with the pre-expansion population figures. —Vensatry (ping) 19:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I have added with ref. Thanks for your reply.--Vin09 (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- If we have a reliable source for the updated figures (for expanded areas), it's fine to add it. Else, I'd advise you to stick with the pre-expansion population figures. —Vensatry (ping) 19:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think I got the answer by checking our conversation User_talk:Vensatry/Archive_23#Population. My doubt was Guntur city population was increased by merging surrounding villages, so the population was increased. Same for Nellore. As per your statement, which you told me long back, I added these two places population in the info boxes. So, I asked is it correct to add them or we should go back to 2011. As far as I know, the municipality added the villages population to the corporation based on 2011 census. Anyway thanks for responding.--Vin09 (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Wow
There are several small Indian list present, including of English Vinglish. But, what is more surprising is that you chose to raise this topic on my flc. Size really doesn't matter, if your list/article is well-refrenced. And, there are lots of tiny awards list by actors on wikipedia, but you went on to notice only this. Wow.—Prashant 15:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Is the English Vinglish list an FL? When you make comparisons try atleast to cite some good examples such as List of accolades received by 12 Years a Slave (film) and List of accolades received by 127 Hours. "Size really doesn't matter" – Really? are we aware of WP:CFORK and criterion 3(b) of WP:WIAFL? For now, I'm concerned only about this list because it's at FLC right now. —Vensatry (ping) 18:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I hope you can organise 20-30 moreawards shows in India. Will you? Only then Indian lists will be bigger. If a country has only 5 awards ceremony, what to expect? That is not my fault. Coming to the list, Since the main article was quite large,I had to split the page. I will be working on the main article as there is lot more to add, especially production through its DVD bonus disc.—Prashant 19:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also, I just checked all your cricket FLs. They are tinnier as compared to this list. So, why no one objected then?—Prashant 19:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Do you even get my point by going through both the guideline and criteria? If a country has only 5 award ceremonies, why not list them in the parent article itself. What's the need to fork them out and go for an FLC? The main article being "quite large" alone is not satisfactory enough to warrant a separate article. The list, in itself, must satisfy all the requirements of a stand-alone list. On what basis you compare the cricket lists with award pages? The members of WP:CRIC have an "unwritten" rule for different kinds of lists (based on topics) that fall under the project's scope. All my cricket FLs, comply with the standards of a stand-alone article. —Vensatry (ping) 20:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Also, I just checked all your cricket FLs. They are tinnier as compared to this list. So, why no one objected then?—Prashant 19:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I hope you can organise 20-30 moreawards shows in India. Will you? Only then Indian lists will be bigger. If a country has only 5 awards ceremony, what to expect? That is not my fault. Coming to the list, Since the main article was quite large,I had to split the page. I will be working on the main article as there is lot more to add, especially production through its DVD bonus disc.—Prashant 19:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oh! I'm really sorry for that. I did not meant to be rude. Actually, I did not read your last line on the flc. Sorry for that. I really appreciate your works on Cricket lists. It's just I gave a wrong example.—Prashant 20:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2015
- Foundation elections: Board candidates share their views with the Signpost
- Traffic report: Round Two
- In the media: Grant Shapps story continues
- Featured content: Four first-time featured article writers lead the way
Will get back to you. Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, its a 2-3 minutes guest role, see the page now. Rajeshbieee (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Rajeshbieee: I wanted to know how he was credited in the title cards. Also can you point out where he appears in the video? —Vensatry (ping) 16:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- The actors names are not shown in title card, only technicians. Kamal appears between 1:31:45 to 1:34:20 of the film. Rajeshbieee (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Rajeshbieee: Thanks, she is the lady who appears alongside Kamal, right? —Vensatry (ping) 19:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, its the Deiveega Ragam unnimary girl Unni Mary / ( Deepa ) in tamil. Rajeshbieee (talk) 19:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, this was the song that brought her into limelight. —Vensatry (ping) 19:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Kamal Haasan Filmography
What makes you feel that Kamal Haasan's repertoire of 40 Malayalam films is mere 'Point.Of.View'? How can his filmography be a 'personal' point of view? I said he 'predominantly' did non-tamil films in Malayalam because, he has done 40 straight films(+1 Spec Appearance) in Malayalam which together constitute a much bigger repertoire compared to his filmography in Hindi and Telugu.
- Firstly, you were being senseless in your argument as your wording was wrong. Did he "predominantly" act in Malayalam? Secondly, where have I denied that he has been in around 40 films. And, yes making claims like Malayalam was predominant among non-Tamil films without being attributed to any reliable source is a POV. I agree that he was very much active in Malayalam cinema between 1974 and 1978. Yes, only in that period, during which he acted in around 30-35 films. But you cannot sum up his career for sure like what you did in the edit. Besides, we have a mention about his earlier involvement in Malayalam cinema: "The next year he acted in a series of films in Tamil and Malayalam.", "Following the success of Kanyakumari, he started working on more Malayalam films throughout the 70s" in the preceding sentences. Making further emphasis would only make it look like a POV. As I said earlier, the reader can go through the table and make use of sortability feature, to understand how many films has he done in various languages. —Vensatry (ping) 08:19, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
The word "predominant" was used for that period only. His total number of non-Tamil films is around 80, and he has not had a prolific non-Tamil career after 1989. (You should have thought about this before showing childlike haste in dubbing something as 'senseless').
Besides, the emphasis was laid (on his Malayalam career) because, a lot of online webpages may have referenced this wiki article earlier, especially during the days when it claimed he works 'primarily in Tamil and notable films in Telugu'. His Telugu filmography does not contain more than 16 films, while his Malayalam filmography contains 41 films. So, for almost a year, this wiki article had given the wrong information (which was strong 'POV') saying that he 'primarily acted in Tamil & Telugu'. Anyway, you have made your point clear with the response. Thanks for that. So I am making no further edits to it. But, for almost a year, a wrong impression was conveyed about his Telugu repertoire. PS: I respect his notable Telugu filmography which contains evergreen classics like Saagara Sangamam and Swathi Mutyam.
- No, when you used that word it wasn't particularly referring to that period alone. And, yes I remember while ago, there was something like "Kamal Haasan is an Indian actor who primarily works in Tamil and Telugu film industries", which is untrue. I know many of them wouldn't be aware of the fact that he has acted in around 40 Malayalam films. To be very honest, his talents were not properly exploited by the Malayalam filmmakers that he worked with. There are not even a handful of good performances out of the 40 films. However, films like Maro Charitra, Aakali Rajyam, Sagara Sangamam, Swati Mutyam and Indrudu Chandrudu elevated his status to such an extent that they are not just considered a "landmark" in his career, but in the whole of Telugu cinema. I remember Kamal himself saying in one of the interviews that he is worried for not being able to give a film like Ek Duuje Ke Liye or Kokila or Sagara Sangamam in Malayalam. —Vensatry (ping) 08:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
please if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1.Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'll try to review it over the weekend. —Vensatry (ping) 14:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
2nd archive
Almost a year ago you posted comments at the first archive of the National Film Award for Best Supporting Actor, which was under the FLC consideration. The list failed and is now renominated. Would you mind leaving comments there? -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 13:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sure thing! —Vensatry (ping) 14:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
- From the editor: Your voice is needed: strategic voting in the WMF election
- Traffic report: Inner Core
- News and notes: A dark side of comedy: the Wikipedia volunteers cleaning up behind John Oliver's fowl jokes
- Featured content: Puppets, fungi, and waterfalls
- In the media: Jimmy Wales accepts Dan David Prize
- WikiProject report: Cell-ebrating Molecular Biology
- Arbitration report: Editor conduct the subject of multiple cases
DYK for Unnaipol Oruvan (1965 film)
On 22 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Unnaipol Oruvan (1965 film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Unnaipol Oruvan (1965), Tamil writer Jayakanthan's directorial debut, was shot in 21 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Unnaipol Oruvan (1965 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 07:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Uyarndha Manithan has become a GA today! Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah saw that. Are you a Sivaji fan? :) —Vensatry (ping) 13:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. I am also a fan of MGR as well. I am more into the "old is gold" concept. Mani Ratnam films are because Mouna Ragam is the first Indian cinema GA for the 1980s. Nayakan (my next planned GA) is because of the impact it created. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 13:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- You could also add Muthal Mariyathai in your list. —Vensatry (ping) 13:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know why but the mere mention of Muthal Mariyathai or Gauravam makes me laugh. Sivaji is a natural when it comes to comedy as even when he speaks seriously or shows his expressions, it is humorous. But it leaves a mark on you in a good way. That's how I started admiring him. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 13:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, he was quite adept at comedy, even at the twilight of his career. But I thought he was effortless in stylized acting. Rajinikanth is the only actor who comes close to him in this regard. —Vensatry (ping) 14:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- You are right. His style is shown especially in films like Pasamalar (his high class society scenes), Navarathri (as the widower) and Puthiya Paravai. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 14:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, he was quite adept at comedy, even at the twilight of his career. But I thought he was effortless in stylized acting. Rajinikanth is the only actor who comes close to him in this regard. —Vensatry (ping) 14:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know why but the mere mention of Muthal Mariyathai or Gauravam makes me laugh. Sivaji is a natural when it comes to comedy as even when he speaks seriously or shows his expressions, it is humorous. But it leaves a mark on you in a good way. That's how I started admiring him. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 13:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- You could also add Muthal Mariyathai in your list. —Vensatry (ping) 13:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. I am also a fan of MGR as well. I am more into the "old is gold" concept. Mani Ratnam films are because Mouna Ragam is the first Indian cinema GA for the 1980s. Nayakan (my next planned GA) is because of the impact it created. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 13:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Veedu (1988 film)
On 23 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Veedu (1988 film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the house which Balu Mahendra constructed as a set for the film Veedu (1988) is now home to a film school he started in 2007? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Veedu (1988 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 07:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I am pleased to inform you that 16 Vayathinile is now a GA! Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 12:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Great work! Feel free to suggest more hooks here. —Vensatry (ping) 13:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
As you have previously commented on similar nominations, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year which is now nominated at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year/archive1? Harrias talk 11:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Harrias: Can you weigh in your opinion here? —Vensatry (ping) 08:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Definitely; I'm off to work now, but I'll leave it open to have a look at later. Thanks for your review, and for sticking with your point, I got it eventually! Harrias talk 08:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2015
- News and notes: WMF releases quarterly reports, annual plans
- Discussion report: A relic from the past that needs to be updated
- Featured content: When music was confined to a ribbon of rust
- Recent research: Drug articles accurate and largely complete; women "slightly overrepresented"; talking like an admin
- Traffic report: Summer, summer, summertime
- Technology report: MediaWiki blows up printers
DDLJ
Would you care to take a look at Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge? I am trying to make it FA worthy, but I am told that the prose is still not up to par. It had a peer review already. I would like to hear your suggestions, before it goes to FAC. BollyJeff | talk 02:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Vensatry:, are you going to be able to look at this? I just want to make sure that you got my message. BollyJeff | talk 21:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Bollyjeff: Sorry for the delay. I don't do films as I'm not very comfortable with it. Good luck for FAC! —Vensatry (ping) 10:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Pathala Bhairavi turns a GA! Excluding Kalidas (1931), Pathala Bhairavi is the second non-21st century Telugu film to become a GA after Mayabazar, both being my GAs. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Congrats. I've seen the Tamil version of this film on TV. What's the name of the actress who played NTR's mother? —Vensatry (ping) 17:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pathala Bhairavi
Hello! Your submission of Pathala Bhairavi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Calvin999 08:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Re: Tamil cinema
Yes, from the article name, it should contain details of Tamil movies made all over the globe. Else, it should be renamed "Cinema of Tamil Nadu".-RaviMy Tea Kadai 12:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week