User talk:Venkateshkancherla7

Welcome

Hello, Venkateshkancherla7, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pawan Kalyan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'' ([[Telugu language|Telugu]] పవన్ కళ్యాణ్) (born 2 September 1971) is an [[Indian film]] actor, [[Playback singer], [[Martial artist]], [[Film director|director]], [[Screenwriter]], [[Stunt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello I have reverted many of your recent edits because they are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:NOTADVERT and WP:INDICSCRIPT and WP:RS and WP:BLP for starters. Also please use an edit summary so that other editors can at least try to understand what you are attempting to do. Thank you.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Pawan Kalyan, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please provide sources for materials you wish to add to articles, it is vitally important for content about living people. It is also vitally important that content be presented in a neutral point of view and not promotional fluff. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries when editing article content

Please use the edit summary function when you are editing article content. It helps people understand why you are making the edits that you are making. When you have made a large swath of unexplained edits where the overall effect is inappropriate, it is impossible to determine what parts might be legitimate and so be kept rather than being subject to a complete reversal. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pawan Kalyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishnuvardhan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pawankalyan, July 2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pawankalyan, July 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pawan Kalyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopala Gopala. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Pawan Kalyan filmography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog, so we do not add subjective labels such as "Industry hit" etc. All changes also must be provided with reliable sources. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:35, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pawan Kalyan filmography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IMDB is not a reliable source (since it's user-generated), and the rest of your changes are totally unsourced. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, NOT A BLOG! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added source for Industry Hit. It is from IMDB. Whats wrong in that?Venkateshkancherla7 (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is to a large extent a user-generated site, where anyone can add anything, which is why there are severe restrictions (see Wikipedia:Citing IMDb) on using it as a reference here. Restrictions that, since the page you linked to was created by an ordinary IMDB-member and the ratings you base your "Industry hit" on were made by ordinary members, means that IMDB can not be used as a reference the way you did. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Venkateshkancherla7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Venkateshkancherla7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]