User talk:VengadorJusticiero

February 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Jack Woltz. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Stylez995 (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jack Woltz. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Stylez995 (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sro23 (talk) 22:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 23:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Please stop your edit warring. I would prefer not to have to bring this to AN/EW but consider this a final warning. Please bring your concerns to the article's talk page rather than reverting edits and adding hostile comments to the edit summary. —Non-Dropframe _talk 00:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube as a Source

Generally, YouTube isn't to be used as a source. In this instance, what you're linking to is a direct violation of Wikipedia:Verifiability#Copyright and plagiarism. Please read this. Because the footage is posted on YouTube in violation of the owner's copyright, it is specifically against Wikipedia policy. I removed the references but didn't remove your content. However, someone else may and I would highly recommend not reverting to your version until you have sources that conform to WP:SOURCE. —Non-Dropframe _talk 03:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Joker in other media. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 18:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Joker in other media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 18:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at En cuerpo ajeno. 208.54.5.210 (talk) 04:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You've been blocked indefinitely for many, many personal attacks and breaches to civility. El_C 06:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VengadorJusticiero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What's your problem? I'm only a bloody rookie in wikipedia and people like 208.54.5.210, The C, Sro28, etc. only are screwing me with the articles asking me sources. Please unlock me. That's ridiculous. --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Had you read and heeded the warnings you received before being blocked, you woudn't have needed to ask what's wrong. Ahem, you would have not been blocked at all. Max Semenik (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK if I'm blocked "indefinetly". What can I do? I'm only asked "What's your problem?" I know I'm attacked other but please ask yourself "WHY?". I'm oonly trying to contribuite but this people screw me. Yesterday I'm going to read the warnings but this jerk El C blocked me. SRO28 reverted my edit and he's not colombian for had watch En cuerpo ajeno but I'm colombian and I havae been watch this TV series and a little of the remakes. Think about it instead of give me this kind of answers for unblock. --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for personal attacks, and yet you referred to an admin as a "jerk" in the message above. If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to demonstrate that you can interact civilly and constructively with other editors. Comments like the one I referenced will only hurt your cause, not help it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And for you is fair this block? If I'm going to demostrate civility and a constructively behavior please show me the same and don't screw me reverting and asking me for sources when sometimes it's not necesary. --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 02:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since I wasn't involved in the other edits, I can't directly comment on what's gone on there. All I can comment on is what was I'm seeing in talk page comments, edit summaries, and the like. Besides which, in the unblock request, you need to focus on your conduct, not other editors'. —C.Fred (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's the sense of ask unblock if this or another admin don't unblock me and they never forgive my mistakes? --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything that resembles a sincere apology for your mistakes. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information on what you should address in your request. —C.Fred (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although be sincere the answer of the admin is the finger.--VengadorJusticiero (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had an administrator who was willing to discuss the matter with you. Based on that last comment, you don't seem interested in discussing your conduct. So, until you are, this admin is no longer willing to discuss your account being unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]