User talk:Veerabhadrammullapudi

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Poola Rangadu (2012 film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Poola Rangadu (2012 film) was changed by Veerabhadrammullapudi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867723 on 2017-05-02T06:09:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Poola Rangadu (2012 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Veerabhadrammullapudi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Veerabhadrammullapudi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

do not resubmit unless there is actual content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Veerabhadrammullapudi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 09:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poola Rangadu (2012 film). I asked you nicely on the talk page and have not blocked you yet because I thought you would provide some reasons. However if you revert my referenced edits again without providing a valid reason on the talk page (and references from reliable sources to support your claim), I will make sure you are blocked Jupitus Smart 07:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to communicate with other people on this site

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing the same behavior as last time without even trying to discuss matters. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poola Rangadu (2012 film). You have been warned multiple times. Do not remove referenced content without citing a valid reason. I have even pinged you to multiple talk pages, yet you continue to stay away and exhibit the same vandalising behaviour. Stop and establish a consensus before making controversial changes or you are liable for another block. Jupitus Smart 04:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Veerabhadrammullapudi/sandbox

Hello, Veerabhadrammullapudi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 01:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]