User talk:Vedsharma08213

March 2024

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gautama Buddha in Hinduism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joyous! Noise! 04:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Rajendraumale673 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 03:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? I am original person talking to you. Wow very nice, I am Vedsharmaisop that account get blocked. Atleast give the original person's name. Vedsharma08213 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vedsharma08213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sockpuppet of Rajendrumale673.Account used by a Indian belonging from West Bengal. Vedsharma08213 (talk) 17:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Mere denial is insufficient, as every sock puppet denies being one, since that is the whole point. 331dot (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vedsharma08213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reasons specified by SpacemanSpiff mentioned is illogical and have no relations by sockpuppetry.Give a certified reason by researching then you can block or unblock this account. Vedsharma08213 (talk) 11:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether or not you're Rajendraumale673, you have now acknowledged that you are evading a block, and you'll have to address that if you want to be unblocked. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: While there is a lot of similarity with the sock farm that I blocked against, the user has also self admitted to being a returning incarnation of VedSharmaop (talk · contribs), another sockmaster. —SpacemanSpiff 09:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC) I regard as a real human to return this Wikipedia and make Wikipedia great!! I love WikiPedia because Wiki Acts takes immediate action to suspicious one.[reply]