User talk:Vcky92

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted the article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management.
there were two references, but one was to the company itself, and the other was basically an image link. Neither were in-line so we can't tell what fact each is supporting anyway
it's all about what the station does, little about the station itself, not even a location. To show notability you need hard facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits or audited viewers. Since the station has only just started up, it's probably too soon
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: which promotes the building of a healthier society and to help spiritual aspirants attain divine knowledge and eternal bliss... The motive of Shiva Shakthi Sai TV is to inculcate good values and impart spiritual knowledge to the society. It also accentuates the necessity and importance of a powerful Guru in a spiritual aspirant’s journey to attain Self-realization... Most importantly, this channel strives to immerse viewers in divine bliss.—just spam

Before you start on this, you should look at articles for other TV stations so that you have some idea what you are doing Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vcky92/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 13:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vcky92, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 13:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramanananda Maharshi (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This still needs any more available coverage about him overall. Cheers,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ramanananda Maharshi

Hello, Vcky92. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ramanananda Maharshi".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Vin09 (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]