User talk:Vasconicus

Hello Vasconicus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! UtherSRG (talk) 09:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Defunct taxa

Hi Vasconicus, as you're interested in defunct taxa I was wondering if you would be interested in creating Anthropomorpha and Gravigrada? I would do it but don't have the necessary texts to reference. I don't mind helping out with formatting. Cheers, Jack (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil primates and Category:Fossil Primates

I don't think either of these are needed. The article is just an ordered list, with no information on its importance and no references. The material is already better covered in other articles. Likewise, the category is already covered by the various "Prehistoric X" categories. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply here (or on one of the other talk pages) and not in email. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for emaling you. I didn't do it on purpose.

I think we need an overview on Fossil Primates to keep up-dated general information and correct small contradictions amongst articles. That doesn't mean necessarily that the whole list should be in the same article (that is why I said that Wikipedists were encouraged to organize it in a better way). We could divide the list along the Family level, that is to say: suborders, infraorders, superfamilies and families in the main article (which we could even merge with Primates; my favourite choice) and under the Family level in specific articles (Notharctidae, Adapidae and so on), including subfamilies, tribes, genera, species and even subspecies. Vasconicus (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]