User talk:Vanthorn/Archieve 2009
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
1980s SI template
See Template talk:1980-1989SISwimsuit.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Supermodel article
I responded on my talk page, of course, about the IP addresses adding unsourced stuff.
Also, as I stated in my edit summary to you, we should not remove references just because you have to pay to read them (as long as the references are valid). Think of how many things are cited to books that we do not have ready access to.
And, oh, there is an IP address who loves to restore the article back to a worse state. He (or she) just did that, and you either overlooked it or ignored it. Keep an eye out on that IP, and revert him (or her) every single time. Flyer22 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Vanthorn, why do you want the new section separate from the 1990s to 2000s section? It is, in fact, a subsection of the 2000s and should fit that way in the article. It is not as though the term Supermodel is as prominent now in a way where that subsection will be significantly expanded upon. If there does come a day when it can be significantly expanded upon, and is different from the 2000s due to the next decade, then it should be separated. Flyer22 (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
wow vanthorn your a complete loser. Your contributions suck and im going to remove everything you posted on supermodels. Get laid —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoxhei44 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Christie Brinkley
Please stop adding the claim that Brinkley was briefly engaged in the eary 1980s without citing a source that actually supports the claim of an engagement. The cited sources you cited refer only to a brief "romantic relationship," and that alone isn't encyclopedic. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Number of magazine covers with Gisele Bündchen by year
1995= 03 1996= 03 1997= 07 1998= 16 1999= 34 2000= 105 2001= 55 2002= 43 2003= 31 2004= 44 2005= 63 2007= 48 2008= 59 2009= 63 until now, 19 july 2009
Total=574 until now, 19 july 2009 Cantarevolare (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC).
His official site displays every magazine cover photo by photo, year after year. I just told what is shown to anyone! See and count yourself!: http://www.giselebundchen.com.br/gisele_carreira_capas.asp?ididioma=2 Cantarevolare (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC).
This text also says more than 500: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/features/gisele-bndchen-the-charmed-life-of-the-megamodel-1683088.html:
(...)Over a career that’s impressively long by model standards, she has been the face of more than 20 international brands and been on more than 500 magazine covers. The only person to have appeared on more is Princess Diana. Bündchen has already retired once, in 2001, only to make a comeback – and she is only 28.(...)
Cantarevolare (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC).
- It's true! Naomi Campbell really said that! Cantarevolare (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC).
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |