User talk:Vansur

Welcome

!-- This comes from the template

Hello, Vansur, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Vansur, good luck, and have fun. Vansur (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

-->

Hello, Vansur, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Vansur, good luck, and have fun. — Newslinger talk 11:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Dear Admins of Wikipedia - Chitravina N Ravikiran page is not a duplicate page by any means. It is a list of compositions that can be of great help to dancers and musicians. If the page is renamed to "Chitravina N Ravikiran Compositions" that would make it very clear, and should not be removed. Here is a clear example of how https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart is distinctively a different page from https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart From a pure readability standpoint, it gets too messy if all compositions (especially if there are a number of compositions) are listed in the same old page in my opinion. Also, I am also disturbed to see a lot of changes happening on this page and other pages. As a parent who instructs my children to use Wikipedia to research on music related subjects, I find it disturbing to see adult content on educational sites like. Whether the adult related content is sourced or unsourced is irrelevant when it is used by a lot of children for research. Wikipedia should take a stance to only have educational material. It is not an adults only site to be used under parental guidance Vansur (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Vansur, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 11:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm AuroraButterfly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to N. Ravikiran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. AuroraButterfly (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2019 (UTC)