User talk:Vansh stalin

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Abhimanyu—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bhima—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Abhimanyu. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have pasted completely according to bori ce edition .nothing is wrong it is absolutely appropriate Vansh stalin (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Stop making disruptive editing. If you feel anything, open a discussion in talk page but don't do it as you did in article Bhima. Mass removal of content is not acceptable. If you continue to do disruptive editing, you may be blocked. Thank you Fire star on heat (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I have published after proper reading bori critical edition of mahabharata(best mahabharata edition).I am damn sure you have never listened about bori critical edition of mahabharata lest read it.you are actually posting wrong content ,creating your own stories.First of all acc to original mahabharata Duryodhana did not has body of diamond neither bhima spared karna (actually opposite happened).third ,there is no banasena exist.Karna son name was Bhanusena and he was killed by bhima using 1 arrow .Nothing happened as you had written your own fake story.Fourth,Dushashna was killed by Bhima in 17th day not 16th day.You fraudster,lier read mahabharata carefully.Blocking someone cannot changes the truth.Truth always came forward yet it take some times.Please do not feel offended brother .Stop vandalism Vansh stalin (talk) 11:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vansh stalin (talk) I didn't do any edit which led to vandalism or disruption and violated wikipedia policies. I just reverted unsourced edits. Whatever edits I made with reliable sources and citations were accepted. I agree that I engaged in edit war with user Ratan375 as I reverted his edits more than thrice and violated wikipedia rule. I came to know that it was mistake. I apologized him as well. You can check my edits as well. Moreover you didn't warn me more than once. I saw my talk page just now and got only 1 notification just now. (As soon as I saw my notification, I'm replying in this discussion). In that also you abused me by calling kid and went harsh against me. One more thing is that I warned you so that you will be careful and won't get blocked by Wikipedia admins. I showed concern towards you and you are like scolding me. I saw article Abhimanyu just now. In that also, your edits are reverted by other well established wikipedia user. That it indicated that your edits might have been wrong. It's not a mistake to make wrong edits but please be careful. Again I'm making clear that I DIDN'T DO ANY WRONG AND VANDALISTIC edits. I just REVERTED content because reliable sources and citations were not added. I'm basically a reverter. Even in article Drona Parva, I reverted back and I was about to work on it. You again reverted it. I saw now that User with name Raviprakaash also made some edits. So I didn't look into it. How can I get blamed for that. From now if you feel anything wrong about me, please ping me on my talk page before reporting to other admins. Thank you and have a great future. All the best. Fire star on heat (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Satyaki have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fire star on heat (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing and personal attacks. Also, for using an existing source for a new addition without any qualifications. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 16:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hello friend, please express your views in article's talk page instead of editing article directly. Once you add your views in talk page, admins will look over it and justice will be done. If you edit something which contradicts article's content, it will lead to disputes. Don't edit in such a way that it is exactly opposite to the original content. Wikipedia is not collection of opinions, but it relies on true content taken from authentic sources and reliable citations. If your edit is being reverted please don't edit that again, instead put your views in talk page. That helps a lot. If you continue to edit disruptively by adding your own views without proper citations, admins might block you and we might lose a good editor and worthy user. So please be careful and cautious. I'm adding this discussion in order to express my concern. Please don't do any personal attack on a user. This is very dangerous. Once go through all wikipedia policies. Never edit in such a way that it opposes wikipedia policies and violate rules. Hope you will have a great future a head in wikipedia. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Vansh stalin (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kashmir conflict, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 16:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Economy of Pakistan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Perryprog (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 21

Please read wp:minor.Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attribute opinion inline, don't state it as fact or in Wikipedia's voice

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sheikh Hasina seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added opinion bases of international neutral source. It has more than 1 source which I can add Vansh stalin (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rajiv Malhotra, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiv malhotra

He is Hindu activist .he is not member of any Hindu organization. I know you people are vandalizing his wikipedia page Vansh stalin (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]