User talk:Vanisheduser5697543

Speedy deletion of SS Princess Isabella

A tag has been placed on SS Princess Isabella, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a fictional item that lacks recognition for inclusion

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 03:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of QB cruise lines

A tag has been placed on QB cruise lines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 06:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of MS America World City

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as MS America World City, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SS Princess Isabella

A tag has been placed on SS Princess Isabella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Costa Deliziosa"

A page you created, Costa Deliziosa, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. \ / (⁂) 11:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MS America World City

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article MS America World City, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

MS America World City

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 7107 cruises

A tag has been placed on 7107 cruises, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paste ^Talk 08:26, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 7107 islands

A tag has been placed on 7107 islands, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 13:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.

If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.

If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:Vanisheduser5697543/test.

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 15:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of AIDAluna

I have nominated AIDAluna, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDAluna. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dloh cierekim 15:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, AIDAluna maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDAluna.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Aidaluna seatrial.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aidaluna seatrial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File source problem with File:Bar.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swimming pool at AIDAluna.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Swimming pool at AIDAluna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Costa Deliziosa

A tag has been placed on Costa Deliziosa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Costa Deliziosa and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 10:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Costa Deliziosa

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Costa Deliziosa. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Information on your Userpage

Hi Vanisheduser5697543. I don't intend to scare you away or attempt to intimidate you, but I thought you might want to reconsider some of the items on your userpage. You may have not realised that the items on your userpage release personal information about yourself (real name or age etc), which could be used against you in the future. While 99% of all the editors on Wikipedia are friendly, welcoming and harmless, there is a chance your personal information could be misused by editors not so 'high-minded'. A handful of editors have even felt real-world implications due to their Wikipedia edits and release of personal information.

I have deleted some revisions of your userpage in respect to your privacy for the time being, just in case you wish to reverse on your decision to have such content on public display. As a result, the information is only available to administrators. You are, of course, welcome to ask myself or another administrator to restore them, but I just wanted to make you aware of the risks involved with releasing personal information on such a public forum. If you wish to to have the personal information removed so that even administrators cannot view it, I can request oversight on your behalf. You are also welcome to discuss this with me on my talk page, or privately via e-mail if you have any concerns. Hope to hear from you. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 15:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Princess Kaguya.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Kaguya.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Kaguya (cruise ship)

A tag has been placed on Princess Kaguya (cruise ship), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.

As you can see, two prior articles on this ship have been deleted, as it appears to be a concept only, and the articles rely principally on press releases. If the ship had been ordered or laid down, it likely would be different. But this proposal is not even the work of a shipping company, there is no indication financing has been secured, and it seems all of the sources are several years old.

Regards, Kablammo (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Grand class. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 08:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Costa Favolosa

Before creating any more ship articles, please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines because articles as you post them are grossly inadequate to our standards. -MBK₀₀₄ 09:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing, we generally do not create articles on ships that have not yet begun construction. I suggest and I hope that you take heed of this and do not create more articles until the construction has begun because the articles may get deleted and if your previous behavior with the original creation of Costa Deliziosa is repeated, you will more than likely end up blocked from editing as a disruptive single-purpose account. -MBK₀₀₄ 08:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And blogs are not reliable sources per policy, so do not use them for any of your edits, because they will be reverted regardless of if the information is correct. -MBK₀₀₄ 08:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AIDAsol

The article AIDAsol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unfinished ships.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of AIDAsol

I have nominated AIDAsol, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDAsol. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usertalk:Jaypeepacres

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self article assessments

Please do not assess articles that you have written. It is not objective for the author to be assessing their own articles. Just don't do it. -MBK₀₀₄ 19:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solstice class cruise ship

Hi there, Jaypeepacres.
I had a look at the Solstice class article, made a few minor link alterations, but I found that the "Environmental Initiatives" link [1] was already broken! (within about 7 weeks!). I have not been able to find an alternative link so far.
Just letting you know! :-) Regards --220.101.28.25 (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thanks for the lookout! I have corrected the dead link you altered. The page was moved to another link. It already worked.--Jaypeepacres (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I could not find it, but I thought I did have a good look for it! So it goes, the Net is always changing! --220.101.28.25 (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Crystal Serenity

The changes you recently made to Crystal Serenity do not indicate any sources for the information. In fact, the change of the maker of the ship conflicts with the given source. Could you please explain the changes and add sources to prove the reliability of the statements? If not, then I will have to revert your changes. Thanks. Silver seren^C 23:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not like the article will be deleted if I revert your changes and your changes will still exist in the history. Silver seren^C 23:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, it's good. I see that you've put up one reference already and are trying to find others. I just wanted to make sure that you were going to do so, because there have been articles where information was added and not sourced for years. Silver seren^C 23:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, wow, those are some really nice articles. Awesome job on expanding them! I've got them watchlisted now, and i'll keep an eye out for any vandalism or whatever. Silver seren^C 23:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your hard work

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded to Jaypeepacres for all of his hard work in contributing to Ship-related articles and for not getting discouraged from the number of his Ship-related articles that were deleted. Keep on truckin'! Silver seren^C 07:40, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit tags

When an article is tagged for a copyedit, that usually means that someone other than the primary author should do the requested copyedit. Normally I would take care of such matters, but I did not have time, so I left the tag for someone else to take care of. The reason I mention this is because since you were the primary author on Crystal Serenity and Crystal Symphony, it is inappropriate for you to remove a copyedit tag from those articles since you cannot remain objective with your own prose. -MBK₀₀₄ 02:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vision class

FYI, you have been italicizing ''Vision''-class when referring to Royal Caribbean International's Vision-class, but per Wikipedia:SHIPSTYLE#Ship_class_articles, since the class is not named after the lead ship of the class, the appropriate presentation is in plain text even though a ship of the class is named Vision. -MBK₀₀₄ 07:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AIDA Cruises

I understand why you changed the wikireferences to Meyer Werft, leaving the first linkable and the rest not, but it would help if you could include something in the edit summaries to say that is what is going on. Cheers. Weakopedia (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Titanicdepiction.jpg

Hello, I deleted File:Titanicdepiction.jpg for reasons I stated in the file's deletion log. Apologies, —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 04:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dream class

Template:Dream class has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Astros4477 (Talk) 18:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]