User talk:Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h/historical archive/2015

DYK nomination of El Marino

Hello! Your submission of El Marino at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3 originals (Rick Astley album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:3 originals (Rick Astley album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Just have it gone as author request. Diego Grez (talk) 00:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nevergonna2003.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nevergonna2003.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucky Guy (song)

The article Lucky Guy (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucky Guy Ryan Simmons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucky Guy Ryan Simmons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Los Beatles listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Los Beatles. Since you had some involvement with the Los Beatles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 22:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Newspapers

I made the discussion, as you asked. I hope that you contribute to the debate with good faith, evading your self-promotion and other issues that involve you and are typical from your behavior in the past. And one more thing: it's funny that you looked up to Impru20 and attack me in their talk page (it doesn't suprise me that you take time to search about that and begin a nonsense debate there). Regards :) --Sfs90 (talk) 04:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC) PS: You're not retired from Wikipedia, so I will ask you to delete this template from your talk page :)

"evading your self-promotion and other issues that involve you and are typical from your behavior in the past" Oooooooohhh, so adding referenced facts makes me a self-promoter and such stuff. Remember that I retired from Wikipedia because I got enough of you and another irreflexive guy who I am not going to mention because it's not necessary. I urge you to stop qualifying my actions as if everything I did was going to "promote" myself. Get to the facts. I have responded to your message on the article's talk page. And, by the way, I am free to comment whatever I want. If you don't like it, take it elsewhere, I've got nothing to lose. Diego Grez (talk) 14:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes Diego Grez you were also told by AndyTheGrump before that you cannot make these edits since you have conflict of interest. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@OccultZone: I'm not sure what do you mean by "these edits". Review my recent edits and if you find something that could be frown at, and that has not been referenced thoroughly, I will retract myself. Please assume good faith, btw. Diego Grez (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I cannot tell what you are up to, but your contributions do seem to be related with those after which WP:COI issues were raised. The way you are reverting right now without engaging in discussion should be avoided. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Discussion has been prompted several times with this Sfs90 guy, regarding the information in conflict, which basically is whether the newspaper list should include weeklies and monthlies or not, fyi. Diego Grez (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Links? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Just look at my recent contributions, is there anything there that is not 'prompting discussion' with them? --Diego Grez (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

[1] Have you checked WP:NLIST? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 20:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

What's wrong with it? --Diego Grez (talk) 20:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Those names that you are adding have got no articles on en.wiki. Would you like to create each or just provide reliable sources so that I can create them for you? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

I haven't got much time right now, but yes, most of them are worthy of a Wikipedia article. As soon as I get time, I'll give you some sources. Diego Grez (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

It seems like you can also can read and understand Spanish. Sources in those languages are also welcome. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Untitled (Rick Astley album) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled (Rick Astley album). Since you had some involvement with the Untitled (Rick Astley album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk  19:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Bob Esponja listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bob Esponja. Since you had some involvement with the Bob Esponja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk  04:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Mayors/Regidores of Pichilemu

Hi, I made some edits on the Mayor of Pichilemu page, fixing the political party of some mayors and regidores, according to some articles and images published on your online newspaper. In good faith, and hoping to contribute to this article, I suggest you to visit the Servicio Electoral library, in which they have the municipal elections results from 1935 to 1971 (unfortunately they don't have the results by every commune's candidates, but they have some tables with the party/list results for any commune) and the list of regidores elected in all elections since 1941 (in many of the cases, with their political affiliation, which would give you some clues, for example, about the militancy of Carlos Echazarreta Larraín, Sergio Morales Retamal and Olga Maturana Espinosa). Regards! --Sfs90 (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits and your suggestion Sfs90! I have some good material, including that of Servel, I will use some time in the future for the Mayors article, I have not got the time to use them here... Regards, --Diego Grez (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Memoria pichilemina listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Memoria pichilemina. Since you had some involvement with the Memoria pichilemina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Sietecolores (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teresa Núñez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ONG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks buddy! Great to see you around too! --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 04:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Discussion

There is a discussion in which you may be involved. It can be found here. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 01:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

@Ebyabe: I have replied to your comment. Regards, --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 01:43, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Locomotion Tango

The article Locomotion Tango has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Locomotion Tango

The article Locomotion Tango has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Prodded and prod removed by article creator with the comment, "was it a charting song? https://books.google.cl/books?id=YyEUAQAAIAAJ." Link is a deadlink. "Solitary reference merely confirms the song exists and contradicts the label information… still no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG which also reads “Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album” and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Locomotion Tango for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Locomotion Tango is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locomotion Tango until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richhoncho (talk) 09:20, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Locomotion Tango.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Locomotion Tango.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Aldo Polanco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldo Polanco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo Polanco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kraxler (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Roberto Córdova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roberto Córdova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Córdova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Juan Cornejo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juan Cornejo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Cornejo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Viviana Parraguez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viviana Parraguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viviana Parraguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrea Aranda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Aranda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Aranda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Elections in Pichilemu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elections in Pichilemu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elections in Pichilemu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Patricio Morales for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricio Morales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricio Morales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Pichilemu political controversies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pichilemu political controversies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pichilemu political controversies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kraxler (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Die Beatles listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Die Beatles. Since you had some involvement with the Die Beatles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Personal attacks

This is the last time I pass by your personal attacks. You have to learn to be polite, or find another place to write about Pichilemu. --Warko ^talk 20:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Llore. --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

3RR warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Warko ^talk 20:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Rancagüino y alaraco... --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 20:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You don't have the courage to write to me in English, so everybody can see your bad behavior. What a shame. --Warko ^talk 20:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Oh, how discourageous from my side! I said, "From Rancagua, and a complainer". Note that I meant "from Rancagua" to be despective. Happy? Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop this now, both of you, before I call an admin into this (Which I definitely could do since you're both past 3RR). Warko, the irony that you report Diego's edit warring when you're just as guilty. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 18:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Sietecolores

Please stop terrorizing this user and nominating all of their pages for deletion. This is coming from a completely uninvolved editor. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h. You have new messages at Zeke Essiestudy's talk page.
Message added 22:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Jorge Vargas González

Seems like you don't want to see the facts: we are sure that (only) one radio played the guy's song, quoting your own reference. If you are not willing to cooperate, I will have to ask help for an admin (and, believe me, this is the last thing I want to do, but you are not leaving me more options). Best, --Warko ^talk 03:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Go ask "help", Marco. There is a clear disadvantage when it comes to Chilean articles and references, and you know it. US, British and other European countries have lots of their newspapers, books, and other materials, in digitized forms, making their access much more universal. That directly helps Wikipedia articles. This would be the case if we had such an access. I am sure there is material on Vargas' so called (awful) song with his so much disgusting voice. But I recall that was not the only national radio that played the song in a regular way, that's why I'm not taking your point and leaving without saying anything (as you usually do, Mr. Correa). --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 03:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

I really don't care if the song is good or bad. You are saying "that was not the only national radio that played the song in a regular way", but there is no evidence of that. I modified the redaction of the phrase (and I gave you the point about the "national radio"), but you are the one who is usually reverting my edits without saying nothing. Best, --Warko ^talk 04:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)