User talk:Vanilabar

September 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Komati (caste) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your recent editing history at Komati (caste) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lemonaka (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vanilabar reported by User:Lemonaka (Result: ). Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 08:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information is being tampered by few people, compare the information with the older articles its clearly mentioned over there, that komatis belonged to upper echelons of shudra varna and later due to adoption of vegetarianism they were considered as vishyas. Vanilabar (talk) 09:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the talk page rather than edit warring. — Czello 09:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then dont tamper the information, let it be it as it is. Let the people know the real information Vanilabar (talk) 09:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's on you to discuss on the talk page after you've been reverted per WP:BRD. — Czello 09:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you can compare the plot with previous versions of it Vanilabar (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A whole plot is missing about what you have undone just now Vanilabar (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I request you to undo your revisions asap Vanilabar (talk) 09:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Komati (caste)) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Salvio

11:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanilabar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being blocked for no reason Vanilabar (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Incorrect, you are blocked for edit warring. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@ Vanilabar (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you are now Confirmed to be evading your block, I've updated the block to be site wide. @Salvio giuliano: as an FYI.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]