User talk:Valrith

Archives

Please add all new discussions to the bottom of the page. All replies will be given here, so please place my talk page on your watchlist. Thank you.

AfD nomination of Leah Luv

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Leah Luv. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Luv. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Valrith! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 420 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Mai Goto (voice actress) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jan Von Arx - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Candy Manson

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Candy Manson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Manson (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kelle Marie

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kelle Marie. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelle Marie. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stephanie Adams

I don't see how their argument holds any water at all. The IP, according to their edit summary, is claiming that we have no way of knowing that the press releases are coming from Adams directly. But they're at her site! The IP's edit should be reverted, IMO. Dismas|^(talk) 03:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anika Knudsen

Please do not remove references from articles, such as you did for Anika Knudsen! If you feel that an inline reference is out of place, you can for example use Template:Failed verification. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 12:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That template does not appear to be appropriate, as it claims it should be used when a cited source contradicts a claim it's supposed to support... What policy are you referring to in making your statement? Valrith (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Blue

I'm at work and thus can't check questionable sources. You're usually on at this time, I think, so I'm just asking you to check on the edits being made to the Ashley Blue article tonight. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 00:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very questionable indeed. Adding 2 full paragraphs on a supposed controversy (which is not a controversy at all) to an article about someone that is not 2 paragraphs long itself just isn't reasonable, even if the issue were important (it's not)... Valrith (talk) 03:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Friends of Burma - npov

I agree with your "needs editing to read less like a promo/psa", I've removed the "Board of Directors" section. Let me know if there are further tweaks you'd like to see. - Roy Boy 02:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gettting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimeetup Kentucky? Join us at THATCamp KY, June 1-2, 2013

Wikimeetup Kentucky - We need you!

Hi Valrith! I'm helping to organize THATCamp Kentucky - June 1 & 2 at the University of Kentucky in Lexington. Take a look at the Tentative Schedule. Let's get together in person to work on Kentucky-related wikipedia pages, what do you say? If you have any questions, please email the THATCamp KY Organizer, Lee Skallerup Bessette (Morehead State University, @readywriting) at thatcampky@gmail.com. Please sign up to participate Wikimeetup Kentucky. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! Randolph.hollingsworth (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Your cool.

Greshthegreat (talk) 20:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!!!

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple.

If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greshthegreat (talk • contribs) [reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Valrith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Cox, Artist listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Cox, Artist. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Cox, Artist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Certes (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]