User talk:ValiantRed600

Welcome!

Hello, ValiantRed600, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Arrest of Betts and Gash, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PhGustaf (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arrest of Betts and Gash

A tag has been placed on Arrest of Betts and Gash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to yin and yang, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ludwigs2 01:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Celebrities with Criminal Records

The article List of Celebrities with Criminal Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP nightmare, will never be a complete list

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 07:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Michelle-Henry-Arrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle-Henry-Arrest.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of Living people

Hi, I see you're new here so I thought I'd should point out our policy dealing with biographies of living people. Because of the real-life consequences of what we write in Wikipedia, we can't make contentious claims in our articles and any assertion about a person that may be seen in a negative light should be backed up by references in reliable sources. For example, you can't create articles such as List of Celebrities with Criminal Records and then list a bunch of people without references. Even a well-referenced list on this topic would be problematic. This list has been proposed for deletion because of this reason. From now on please watch what you write about living people. Thanks, Them From Space 08:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valiance

The article Valiance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism of questionable notability. Completely unsourced - no indication of widespread usage - seems like something that was made up.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Valiance

I have nominated Valiance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valiance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Valiance

I have nominated Valiance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valiance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Valiance, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 12 hours

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ValiantRed600, and you are therefore blocked for a period of 12 hours. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Nikki Blonsky. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Valiantian

I have nominated Valiantian, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valiantian. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Leo (astrology) has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – Tommy [message] 14:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

On Mets-Phillies rivalry, you added information to the lead that was not supported by a reference. Since this is a good article, additions should all be reliably sourced. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 03:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rockies - Padres Rivalry

The article Rockies - Padres Rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking reliable sources to establish notability, mostly a coatrack for fancruft.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 09:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Celebrities with Criminal Records

Category:Celebrities with Criminal Records, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 15:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that your additions of this category to Jordin Sparks, Jennifer Coolidge and America Ferrera have been reverted per WP:BLPCAT as there is no mention of, or reference for, crimes in those articles. – ukexpat (talk) 16:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oakland Athletics

Please note that colors are not proper nouns, so their names in infoboxes need not be capitalized. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 13:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, color names are not proper nouns. Please also note that the infobox lists uniform colors, not logo colors, so please desist from putting red in the Yankees' infobox. Gray is also unnecessary, as all teams wear road gray. — KV5 • Talk • 13:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Phil of the Future. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Glenn L (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in not smoking

Category:Wikipedians interested in not smoking, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cap Logos for Rivalry Articles

Hi. I saw you have been changing the cap logos to the other logos for the rivalry articles. I believe there was a discussion about this in one of the archives of the Y-RS page to keep it with cap logos. All of the other rivalries have been kept that way as a result too. Thanks. Arnabdas (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melky Cabrera

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Melky Cabrera appears to have added premature information about a reported signing, so I removed it for now. The signing is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the signing has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The source you added also says "Finalization of the deal hinges on Cabrera passing a physical, according to a source."—Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twin films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaws. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ValiantRed600. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ValiantRed600. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ValiantRed600. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]