User talk:ValentineStockdale

Your user page User:ValentineStockdale is much the same as the new article Valentine Stockdale, which you began, but I have the impression that you aren't Valentine Stockdale. If you are, please see WP:COI. What's going on, please? Xn4 (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for your message. I should confirm firstly that I am Valentine Stockdale.

I have read the page you suggested outlining conflicts of interest but am unsure as to whether there is a conflict here.

Please let me know what you would like to do.

I hope very much however that you decide to keep the page.

ValentineStockdale (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Valentine, I wanted to draw your attention to Wikipedia:Autobiography. The question of whether to keep Valentine Stockdale is a matter for WP:Notability, and I don't see a problem with it myself, but if I were you I should let other editors improve the article in mainspace, and your user page might be better not mirroring that.

I'm still puzzled by "...the grandson of Sir Edmund Villiers Minshull Stockdale, 1st Battalion", which I've corrected at Valentine Stockdale (but not at User:ValentineStockdale) to "...1st Baronet". It seemed to me that if the writer didn't know what "1st Bt" stood for after a name, it looked very much like someone trying to start what seemed to be an autobiography, but actually wasn't, if you see what I mean. Xn4 (talk) 21:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Blocked vandal

I have blocked user Terrapin2010 (talk · contribs) indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. I do not think there is any useful further action we can take about this account, but if you want to take it further you could post at WP:ANI, the adminstrators' notice-board for incidents. The place to request protection for your page is WP:RFPP, but we are reluctant to protect pages unless there is continuing, rather than sporadic, vandalism. Finally, WP:BLP/H has good advice for people unhappy with their Wikipedia entry. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Ninth Cloud for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Ninth Cloud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ninth Cloud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parrot of Doom 12:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valentine Stockdale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valentine Stockdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentine Stockdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parrot of Doom 12:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lord Owen's Lady for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lord Owen's Lady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Owen's Lady until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Parrot of Doom 12:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of King Kennedy

The article King Kennedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any independent reviews; unclear that this meets WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]