User talk:Vaibhav.times

vaibhav Choudhary

Hello. I most certainly read your edit before deleting it. It is not clear that the site skjbollywoodnews.com is a reliable source. What is clear that a lot of people (or just one person?) have recently been adding that site to articles in a very spammy fashion. If it turns out that the site is a reliable source and thus appropriate for Wikipedia then fine, we can use the site as a source but the actions of theses individuals, including you, apparently, is still problematic and very spammy looking. SQGibbon (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about skjbollywoodnews nor about Bollywood in general. What I do know is that articles about that topic get spammed a lot. And the behavior surrounding adding that site was just like the behavior with other obvious spam attempts. If you are confident that it is a reliable source, and it certainly might be, then feel free to add it back into articles. It is a relatively new site and there is a lot of effort being put into making sure it is plastered all over Wikipedia which even if it is a reliable source looks suspicious. But like I said, I do not know much about the topic so feel free to edit as you see fit. SQGibbon (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Vaibhav.times, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest with your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Vaibhav.times", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaurang Doshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nastik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Enough reviews

The page Baby has too much reviews . Find some international source not some unknown website Frost The World (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

your link is not working https://twitter.com/skjbolly/status/560498680289959937--

celebrity tweets are not enough . They will use any source to promote their films. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frost The World (talk • contribs) 04:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting old edits

How did you revert old edit by 112.79.39.165 . I asked the same question in my talk page but the wiki administrator couldn't give any correct reply .

When i try to revert/undo some old edits , the message appears that The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits; if you wish to undo the change, it must be done manually. But I have seen other editors have no problem in reverting old edits . How do they do that .

You can see this edit from the page Baby(2015 film) [1]

(cur | prev) 03:28, 30 January 2015‎ Vaibhav.times (talk | contribs)‎ . . (17,241 bytes) (+620)‎ . . (Undid revision 644719523 by 112.79.39.165 (talk)- Valid Source and if you want to discuss on talk page) (undo | thank)Frost The World (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vinay Virmani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 06:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (code=ipa)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 02:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.238.111.63 (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vaibhav.times. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]