User talk:V jazz

Hello, V jazz, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! F Rahaman (Bangladesh) (talk) 07:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

F Rahaman (Bangladesh) (talk) 07:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

I have fixed a couple of redirects you had created; the correct format is #REDIRECT [[Article]] - there must not be a space between '#' and 'REDIRECT'. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Siliguri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:OVERLINK

Please review WP:OVERLINK. It is incorrect to link the same article repeatedly. Adding repeated links clutters the article without improving accessibility. Also, it is incorrect to link ordinary English words. Finally, it makes no sense to create a link within an article to the same article, i.e., where you linked "Jalpaiguri" in the Jalpaiguri article. Please review the Wikipedia policy. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 16:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something that you do not understand here? After I posted this, you went right back and edited Jalpaiguri without regard to Wikipedia style. I will revert your edits if you continue to do this. This is not constructive. If you want to continue to edit in Wikipedia, you are going to have to accept Wikipedia style and policies. Ground Zero | t 09:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Belakoba

added a link pointing to Mal

Dhupguri

added a link pointing to Urban

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dhupguri subdivision

I have proposed Dhupguri subdivision for deletion. Your comments please as you created it. - Chandan Guha (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Dhupguri subdivision for reasons. - Chandan Guha (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhupguri subdivision for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhupguri subdivision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhupguri subdivision until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shyamsunder (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Sayan Basu (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]