User talk:V-apharmd

Caption1
Caption2

February 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from MUD, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

actually the explaination was posted on the talk page. but I am not crazy about it, I just find the further reading extreme trivial, that it seems more promotion of the reading than actually informative. hence I moved it to the talk page, but if you feel otherwise, I am fine with that. V-apharmd (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

V-apharmd, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi V-apharmd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

V-apharmd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

good afternoon. I was invited to join Wikipedia after my son user kevoras messed up rather brilliantly and had all his account banned last week. we are from the same household, so I understand you qualify me as the same userbase. However with all his accounts banned, this is now the sole user in this household, and I wasn't even supportive of his arguements made. Does this still compromises Wiki's rules of a sockpuppeteer? I was having fun last night corrected info of my area of interest, kinda sore to see myself blocked despite this is now the single only account from this IP. If this still fail wikipedia rules, then I am fine with it. Just want to see if it is appealable. thank you.

Decline reason:

Sorry, your story is not credible; your "son" and "you" are indistinguishable. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.