User talk:V°cc

Welcome

Hello Netzachiel, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Netzachiel, good luck, and have fun. – Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperthymesia

Hi there, Netzachiel. I quite agree with you that Jerome S. Bruner only wrote the foreword to professor A. R. Luria's book, The Mind of a Mnemonist. And yes, it was first published in 1968. But the edition used as ref in the Hyperthymesia article has the ISBN 0-674-57622-5 and so was the 1987 edition - the same one listed under "Books" in the Alexander Luria article. I'm not sure if it was revised much between these editions, so I guess we just need to choose which one to use as the ref - unless maybe it's important to show when it was first published? What do you think? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:V°cc

A tag has been placed on User:V°cc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanor Rigby's "notable" covers under unspecified criteria

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Eleanor Rigby. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Musical genres from third party observers

At List of glam metal bands and artists, you removed Aerosmith because of something a band member said. I wanted to point out that the artist does not have the definitive word on their own genre. Rather, WP:SECONDARY sources (third party observers) such as music critics and musicologists are the ones who define the genre. Two famous examples of artists who are commonly and frequently defined by genres that they refuse to accept are Primus who hates the funk metal label, and Tupac Shakur who repeatedly said he did not create any gangsta rap. So it doesn't change our genre categories if Aerosmith thinks they are not glam metal. Binksternet (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a Fact survey and thank you

Thank you for testing out the Add A Fact browser extension! This extension was developed as an experiment by the Future Audiences team at the Wikimedia Foundation to learn about new ways of contributing to Wikipedia from outside of our website/apps.

We are planning to wrap up this experiment this December, sunsetting the extension and publishing our findings on-wiki. We’d like to invite you to take part in an exit survey to tell us more about your experience of trying out the extension, and to share any ideas you have about how to support new ways of contributing to Wikipedia. The survey is anonymous (see the survey privacy statement) and should take about 10–15 minutes to complete.

You can take the Goole Forms survey here.

Kind regards, MPinchuk (WMF)

17:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)