User talk:Uwunoodles

June 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sulli, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please change it back. There is NO OFFICAL SOURCE STATING SHE HUNG HERSELF. The Korean Times article saying that she did is using rumors as a source. The article I provided (the Naver news one) is an official statement about the autopsy results. The most information that was officially released was that she died by suicide and that is it. No other specifics were ever named and it's disrespectful to include such rumors as they are just that. Rumors. Wikipedia should not be spreading rumors as if it were truth. Uwunoodles (talk) 04:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Uwunoodles As I had stated clearly and explictly at Talk:Sulli#Cause of death, Wikipedia is NOT censored neither is what stated contrary to reliable sources. In fact, I also linked the previous WP:CONSENSUS made at the every same discussion. In which, at this point of time, you DON'T HAVE any WP:CONSENSUS to overwrite the previous WP:CONSENSUS made. And let me remind you, going against WP:CONSENSUS, and continuing your unacceptable WP:IDHT behaviour, will result in you getting blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image accepting rumors as facts simply because your so called "reliable source" spread leaked (and illegal as it was confidential) information. Y'all literally have no respect for Sulli. Not only is it disrespectful, it's unprofessional. Multiple people have brought up the fact that there is no truly reliable source for the hanging claim. Yet you insist on using sites that are spreading rumors. Absolutely disgusting behavior. Uwunoodles (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sulli. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Uwunoodles. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out your disrespect and unprofessional for allowing illegaly obtained info as sources is not attacking you. It's stating a fact. As is pointing out that behavior like that is disgusting. Because it is. Uwunoodles (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Uwunoodles. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 19:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not personal attacks. 🤷🏻‍♀️ Uwunoodles (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]