Jump to content

User talk:Utsill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Utsill, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Utsill! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International Justice Mission. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Memphis Meats

[edit]

Hey Utsill,

So, I don't know what's going on at Memphis Meats anymore. The RfC is a wacky and crazy thing, with a survey that clearly diverges from the discussion. In a perfect world / how Wikipedia is usually run, we would have gotten to the point we might be at now ... and then a third party or RfC would be initiated, but alas Wikipedia doesn't always run perfectly.

Nonetheless, here's two basic truths:

  1. There's a bloc of users who aren't really affiliated with the article (or engaging in discussion) that are voting among three versions of an article. These three versions are all pretty dated, and unfortunately none of the voters have looked down to examine new information (though that's not really their fault), but it is nonetheless true that they certainly support Version 2.
  2. There's four or five users having a discussion in the RfC's discussion session. What we currently have - which took all of us compromising - is listed under current version. Now you listed 4 issues you had with the article; I attempted to address two of them (I fixed the product launch accuracy issue and I hyperlinked in-vitro (while earlier I made sure we have hyperlinks to cultured meat), but I just don't think you're going to get a consensus around the taste/sustainability claims or around the specific products. (A hard maybe to specific products.)

I don't say this to discourage you from making your arguments, but I do want to prepare you that there might be some blowback. You saw that Jytdog responded to your last comment by saying "There's no need to continue this discussion." I think that there's a reasonable chance that a user closing the RfC either doesn't read the discussion or otherwise pretends like the vote isn't a sham, and version 2 gets the go-ahead. So at some point, it might be worth it to cut your losses on those two claims, assuming you prefer the current discussed version to version 2. Totally up to you.--216.12.10.118 (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. That all seems reasonable to me. I don't have much experience with RfC's. Hopefully if someone does try to close it based on those misleading votes, there will be an avenue for me to contest it. Utsill (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am not quite as confident as you that the avenue will be there. At some point Wikipedians generally like to move on from issues (there's a degree of inertia); plus even if the situation is wacky; it's not altogether clear that a majority would / wouldn't support version 2 (compared to the current version ... who knows, but it does seem like version 3 is not getting a lot of support). Additionally, I do think you'll find that the opposition to the taste notes will be pretty across the board (as they are now), which will make your case harder. Nonetheless, obviously continue as you see fit!--216.12.10.118 (talk) 20:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. My understanding is that we need consensus though, not just a majority vote. If it is decided on majority, I don't think I have much hope. If I were forced to give a single option to win against #2, I would do away with the "taste" bit, the "cultured" bit," and the "commercial release" bit, since I think the "sustainability" bit is the most important. Utsill (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How wikipedia ideally runs vs. how it actually runs sometimes vary. I'd suggest making a pitch for sustainability in the discussion. I could potentially see an argument for sustainability coming out (though I'm currently leaning against, I much more open to that than I am to the taste). The trick will be relying on third party sources and not the company's own claims (unless its third party sources describing the company's ethos, which might be okay)--216.12.10.118 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think third party suggestions of the sustainability benefits of cultured meat in general are less useful for this page than the company's statements of their products' sustainability benefits. Though in my general inclusionist perspective, I think the general benefits would be good to include in an ideal WP. Utsill (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ivan Milat

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ivan Milat. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of all-female bands. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion on recent edits to Direct Action Everywhere?

[edit]

Hey Utsill,

I just deleted a sub-section of "Tactics" in Direct Action Everywhere. Definitely felt like it was more guilty than most other parts of the article that read like an advertisement. Also added some additional info one one of their Whole Foods open rescue. Would love to hear a second opinion if you've got one Rejewskifan (talk) 05:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. In this situation, I would have pinged me like this: @Rejewskifan: on the DxE Talk page instead of leaving the message on my Talk page. Your edits appear good to me. I think the information you cut was either poorly cited enough or unimportant and positively-spun enough to justify that deletion. I only did a little line editing for you :) Utsill (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Be bold

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Be bold. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Blockbuster LLC

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blockbuster LLC. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Recent years. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Patriot Prayer

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Patriot Prayer. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Danica Roem

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Danica Roem. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Spire Credit Union

[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spire Credit Union. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback on cell ag company draft

[edit]

Hello @Utsill: - I notice that cellular agriculture is one of your stated interests. If you're able and willing, would you take a look at a draft article about a cell ag company for me? (Find it here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Perfect_Day_(company) ) I have disclosed a COI and tried to write it in as neutral language as possible, but it was nevertheless rejected for reading like an advertisement. I did reach out to the reviewer for feedback (see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:CodeLyoko#Perfect_Day_(company) ), and I'd like to get the tone right. It's possible that I'm too close to the subject - would you mind taking a look and offering your thoughts? Thanks in advance. BlackMaus (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as I'm still a bit of a newb here - any advice on how to appropriately use links? (I'm quite sure I did it inappropriately above...) *sheepish grin* Thanks... BlackMaus (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI where I mentioned you

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editing by User:Drmies. Nil Einne (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dog-whistle politics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:External links on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Horse slaughter on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020–21 women's strike protests in Poland on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Wikipedia talk:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Hi Utsill! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over two years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|Utsill|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]