User talk:Usiel
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions, or the ones you have yet to make! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
- User:Redwolf24/Bootcamp My own personal summarized Bootcamp.
Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.
Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.
Redwolf24 (Talk) 03:18, 29 November 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 28 December 2024 T 17:26 UTC.
P.S. I like messages :-P
Welcome!
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to the Weapons, Equipment and Vehicles of the Imperium (Warhammer 40,000) article. You asked a few questions regarding entering of information on some talk pages, so as Wikipedia's self-stylised 40K guru, I will attempt to answer.
- In regards to the power armour additions, I've gone and had a fiddle with them, so use that as a guide. As a rule, we shouldn't go into too much detail, because while we try to cater for the hardcore gamer, we must also remember that 'Johnny "What the feth's a bolter?"' will also be reading these articles. The power armour additions were good, but might just be pushing the envelope a fraction.
- Secondly, for a similar reason to above, don't say Adeptus Astartes. Say Space Marines.
- As for the source details, some articles have a references section, others don't. Add the references to any article you use them for if there is a section. If not, its your call to create such a section, leave it on the talk page, or not include it.
Any other questions, come and buzz me at my talk page. Regards, Saberwyn 09:28, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
The Future of WP:40k
[edit]Hello. As a member of WP:40K I ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on a matter that I feel will shape the future of the project. Thanks. --Falcorian (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Would this be...
[edit]...the same Usiel from the DoW40k: FoK boards? If not, ignore/delete this (after you check out the mod:P) Lprsti99 (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Warhammer 40K Project updated
[edit]
- Assessment tags have been added to the project banner.
- New material, including transwiki instructions and an organizational chart, has been added to the main project page.
- Please help us get the Warhammer 40K project back on track!
Protonk (talk) 05:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Sent with Auto Wiki Browser to all 40K project members.
Project activity
[edit]This message is a test to check to see if members of the Warhammer 40K Project are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can remove the name yourself or talk to me and I'll do it.
If you are still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox ({{User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000}}) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future.
We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the Version 1.0 assessment scale (the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. Protonk (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)