User talk:Username7891

August 2011

Hello Username7891. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Luke Ravenstahl, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Bill Price (nyb) 19:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Ravenstahl

Please see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Luke_Ravenstahl#Edits_from_individuals_with_possible_conflicts_of_interest to discuss your possible conflict of interest in editing the Luke Ravenstahl article. You have a right to personal anonymity, but please be aware that it is against Wikipedia's policies to edit articles with which you may have a conflict of interest. You may be interested in seeing our FAQ for organizations, which also applies to governments, government agencies, and government workers. Thank you. —Bill Price (nyb) 19:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Luke Ravenstahl has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You have directly lifted unnecessarily long passages from news reports. I have not actually removed the offending prose because I do not intend to escalate our interactions into an edit war. This is separate from the possible conflict of interest issue. —Bill Price (nyb) 20:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat deletion of sourced material

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:29, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued removal of material. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 16:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]