User talk:User publisher wiki

This is User publisher wiki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leyla Kuliyeva (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leyla Kuliyeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User publisher wiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 10:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leyla Kuliyeva (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Leyla Kuliyeva instead.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

The information in this draft may be merged into the article by a neutral editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leyla Kuliyeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, User publisher wiki. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Leyla Kuliyeva, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User publisher wiki: following up on this - do you know, work for or represent Leyla Kuliyeva, or are you her? Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the information User publisher wiki (talk) 14:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The grammar and overall quality of the content are very poor, and the article is extremely short. As it stands, it does not meet Wikipedia's standards and reflects poorly on the platform.

I have attempted to improve the article by adding better information, refining the grammar, and enhancing the design (e.g., adding photos and more structured content). However, my edits were reverted by one or two users, which brings me to this proposal:

Revise the Current Page: The article needs a comprehensive rewrite to improve its grammar, expand its content, and make it visually appealing with proper formatting and media.

Delete and Recreate: If revising the article is not feasible, it may be better to delete the current version and replace it with a new, well-written one that better represents the topic.

I believe improving this article will significantly enhance its usefulness to readers and ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's mission to provide accurate, high-quality information. I’d appreciate the community’s input on this matter.

Thank you! User publisher wiki (talk) 14:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over at the article for Leyla Kuliyeva you have stated that I have been assigned to create a page for this individual. Please clarify who assigned you this task, as it would appear perfectly straightforward that there is some kind of conflict of interest and/or undisclosed paid editing going on here (and you are required by the terms of this site to declare what that conflict of interest is). Axad12 (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, GPTzero indicates that there is a 100% probability that your post above was AI generated. Please cease using AI and respond in your own voice so that it is clear that you understand the issues being raised here. Axad12 (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

As an independent editor of Wikipedia, I have been assigned to review and improve this page. This role is consistent with Wikipedia’s principles, as editors are encouraged to contribute impartially using reliable, verifiable, open sources. My edits are intended to enhance the quality of the article and align it with Wikipedia’s established guidelines.

FYI

Wikipedia operates on the contributions of independent editors who are expected to follow a neutral point of view and base their edits on credible sources. Independence ensures the integrity of the platform and avoids conflicts of interest.

Quality and Clarity:

Articles should be written in clear, professional language that we can see the one who created the page does not follow that, free from grammatical errors that we can see creator has not followed that, and organized to improve readability and coherence, same. The existing page contains poor grammar and lacks adherence to Wikipedia's formatting and quality standards. As editors, it is our responsibility to address these issues.

Verifiability:

Wikipedia’s Verifiability policy states that all content must be supported by reliable, published sources that readers can check. Using unknown or unverifiable sources contradicts this policy and undermines the credibility of the article.

Page Creation and Intent:

While the creation of new pages is allowed and encouraged, it is important to question the intent behind the creation, particularly if the article appears biased or lacks proper formatting. If the creator of this page had a direct request from the subject or organization or a personal connection, they must disclose this relationship as per Wikipedia’s Conflict of Interest and Terms of Use policies. Even when such relationships exist, the page should meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, accuracy, and clarity.

Improving Existing Content:

As known, Regardless of who created the page, all editors have a shared responsibility to refine and enhance the content to meet Wikipedia’s guidelines. This includes ensuring that the article is structured, well-written, and reflects reliable information.

The current state of the article raises questions about the sources used and the intent of its creation. Additionally, the poor grammar and organization detract from the professionalism and credibility expected of Wikipedia pages. As an independent editor, my goal is to rectify these issues by incorporating accurate information from reliable, open sources and improving the overall presentation of the article, that anyone has access to.

Regards, User publisher wiki (talk) 12:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Independent sources that are available in sites, Regards, User publisher wiki (talk) 11:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm the nature of your conflict of interest in relation to Leyla Kuliyeva, and your connection to earlier accounts user:TheWeldere and user:Dmarketingchamp. Thank you. Axad12 (talk) 12:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm the nature of your conflict of interest in relation to Leyla Kuliyeva, and your connection to earlier accounts User publisher wiki (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FYI

I would like to clarify that I have no conflict of interest regarding Leyla Kuliyeva and other Articles. I am fully independent editor contributing to this and other articles using reliable, verifiable sources in accordance with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

And suggest to other to do so. User publisher wiki (talk) 12:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can you simultaneously be an an independent editor of Wikipedia and also have been assigned to review and improve this page?

Surely the obvious reality is that you are the latest of several single purpose accounts with an obvious conflict of interest in relation to the subject. Plus you are a previously blocked user associated with an extensive sockfarm. Axad12 (talk) 12:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly consider previous replies and read it carefully. User publisher wiki (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be both 'independent' and 'be assigned'. I would suggest that you perhaps restrict yourself to using a version of Wikipedia where you are fluent in the language being used, rather than relying on AI generated text. Axad12 (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Axad12,

I would like to clarify that I am an independent editor, and any edits I have made to this page are based on reliable, verifiable sources, in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. I respectfully ask that you refrain from spreading false information about my intentions or actions.

Please ensure that you carefully read the conversation before making any assumptions or further comments about my editing. It’s important that discussions remain respectful and based on the facts, rather than misunderstandings.

As I have already explained my position, I do not plan to engage in further discussion with someone who is not considering the conversation properly. I believe I’ve made my stance clear.

Bestregards, User publisher wiki (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

100% AI generated again (according to GPTzero). Please stop this nonsense. Axad12 (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 10:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Your recent edits to Talk:Leyla Kuliyeva could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leyla Kuliyeva

The article Leyla Kuliyeva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously non-notable individual. She is either not mentioned or mentioned only briefly in most of the sources cited, and all that can be reliably established is that she sometimes acts as a Ju-jitsu judge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. {{ }}

DACartman (talk) 21:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)</[reply]