User talk:User9977

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is believed to be a sock puppet of Mod99 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is permitted, but using them for illegitimate reasons is prohibited, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked (or were blocked in error), you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. We apologize for any inconvenience you have experienced.

Welcome!

Hello, User9977, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 11:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User9977, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi User9977!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User9977. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT as well. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sukhnidhey Films

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sukhnidhey Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User9977 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only have 1 account on Wikipedia. This PC is shared sometimes, that could be the reason for the confusion. I am here to help contribute to Wikipedia, not for spamming. I just wanted to update an article as per latest media reports. Please unblock me and guide how the article can be undeleted. I did not intend to promote anything, maybe I worded it wrongly. Am willing to change it

Decline reason:

See WP:FAMILY and WP:MEAT. Regardless of whether you're the same person, you've edited as one user from one location, and so you won't be unblocked. Request to be unblocked on your Mod99 account. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Sukhnidhey Films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

User9977 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Mod99". The reason given for Mod99's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: Coffee (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Clearly you are a sockpuppet or a meat-puppet of that user. You have extensively edited the same deleted article and are editing from the same IP address. This account is now blocked indefinitely. Yamla (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User9977 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for any violations I may have caused, but it has been purely unintentional. I wish to contribute my expertise to Wikipedia. I am willing to change/reframe the article and learn the proper way to write Wikipedia articles, since I am new to Wikipedia. I hope the admins/editors would understand my viewpoint and give me a chance to prove myself. Once again, I apologize for any violations and state that I am really willing to improve and contribute. Please unblock my account and also permit me to completely reword the article deleted in accordance with your policies. User9977 (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The same unblock request was posted on the other account's talk page. MER-C 07:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User9977 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had been asked to seek unblock request from the other account. Hence the request. I now aim to continue using this account alone, in accordance with your suggestion. Please unblock this account. Henceforth, only this account shall be used for any edits. I have stopped using the other account. Please unblock this account as I have gone through the WIkipedia policies and understand the errors made by me. I will now rectify them and look forward to this opportunity. User9977 (talk) 07:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You comments below make it clear that you have a chronic case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. In one sentence you're saying you don't intend to recreate the articles, and in the next sentence you're asking for advice as to how to rewrite them. The subjects you are attempting to write about do not meet our notability criteria. Please find another place to promote them. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were initially blocked, as Mod99 (talk · contribs), for inappropriate edits around an article on Sukhnidhey Films. What, if any, is your relationship with that company? If unblocked, do you promise to refrain from attempting to create that article? Do you know understand that Wikipedia is not for promotion? Have you read and understood WP:PROMO and WP:COI? --Yamla (talk) 12:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that I am not affiliated with the company. Sukhnidhey Films is a famous film production company- they are recognized internationally for their pioneering work in archaeologcial filmmaking. I have been following their TV Shows and happen to be an admirer and follower of their work. I understand that Wikipedia is not for promotion and had no such intention when I edited the article on Sukhnidhey Films. I have read and understood WP:PROMO and WP:COI. I will not create that article again, but look forward to help in getting it rewritten as per policy under one of your admin's guidance, if you so permit. User9977 (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Above, you wrote "I only have 1 account on Wikipedia". Now, you say you have another account. Why would we trust you? Vanjagenije (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Vanjagenije: I am committed to help contribute my little bit to this encyclopedia. I have understood the weakness of my earlier writing and am pledged to improve it under the guidance of all you admins and experts. I admit my mistakes, and look forward to a chance to undo them. I hope you would provide me with one, so I may prove my abilities. User9977 (talk) 15:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've salted Rituraj Devaang and Sukhnidhey Films to prevent further recreation attempts. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk I request you to please unblock me. As for the salting, I do not intend to create the salted articles, but just wanted you admin's guidance into how it could be reworded under your permissions- I have understood my past errors and confirm again that I am not affiliated with the article's company in any way- just happen to be a fan of their hugely popular TV shows. Sukhnidhey Films is a major Indian film production company that is the Only Outstanding rated Filmmakers in India by the Ministry of Culture^[1] They certainly deserve a Wikipedia article (which, I agree has to be properly worded from scratch as per YOUR guidance). I request you to please unblock me and give a chance, as you could always block me again if you find my conduct wrong. User9977 (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ Page 86, Point 174 on the Official Website: http://www.indiaculture.nic.in/sites/default/files/events/Graded%20List%20of%20applicants%20for%20participation%20in%20Festivals%20of%20India%20abroad.pdf

[1] Page 86, Point 174 on the Official Website: http://www.indiaculture.nic.in/sites/default/files/events/Graded%20List%20of%20applicants%20for%20participation%20in%20Festivals%20of%20India%20abroad.pdf

[1]