User talk:User070510

Welcome!

Hello, User070510, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new users

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Henry20090 (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 15:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the unhelpful edits. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at HAL Tejas, you may be blocked from editing. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Military; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Garuda28 (talk) 05:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Military. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen 13:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please use user talk pages to communicate with other editors, not their main user page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at HAL Tejas. ZLEA _T\^C 12:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, an edit that you recently made to McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet seemed to be a test. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. Try to be more careful with your edits. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fnlayson, I got your message. Actually what happened was I mistakenly took McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet for Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet. I'll try to be more careful with my edits. Thanks for letting me know. -User070510 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, reminding you to be more careful was all I meant above, thanks! -Fnlayson (talk) 22:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for all your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sukhoi Su-30MKI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for reporting it to me. I would like to know if you are a bot or are you actually a registered user?-User070510 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi User070510! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Photos, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]