Jump to content

User talk:Ursul pacalit de vulpe/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ion Morei

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ion Morei, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. pablomismo|\talk 19:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

[edit]

If you continue disruptive edits, you will be blocked from editing. `'Miikka 07:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've already reverted the Moldova and Moldovan language articles 3 times each. Please beware of WP:3RR. Alæxis¿question? 09:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule warning

[edit]

You have violated the three-revert rule at Moldova. As you are a new user, I will, rather than blocking you this time, warn you that edit warring is an unacceptable practice and will result in a block from editing. Please be careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution if an agreement cannot be reached, rather than engaging in an edit war. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seraphimblade. What exactly do we have to do when we don't reach an agreement? How can I present such a dispute resolution?--Tones benefit 14:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you have to reach agreement, you have to discuss with people in article talk pages. Otherwise the simplest solution will be blocking you from editing for disruptive behavior. Since you are trying to edit already established articles, it is your job to convince others that your edits are justified. `'Miikka 16:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

You are blocked for 24 hours for revert warring. I seriously doubt that you are a new user. Nevertheless I don't care as long as you will edit in the way admissible in wikipedia. `'Miikka 16:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map

[edit]

Please don't modify maps created by other people. If you think that the change is necessary, please talk to the person who created the map. I don't think he was an idiot. Nost probably he had serious reasons to waste his time and do what he did. `'Miikka 16:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia

[edit]

Why did you revert economy section in this article? Tamokk 03:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moldova and NATO

[edit]

Deleted. Please write article to the point of the subject. Please don't write essays. `'Miikka 18:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat again: write article to the point of the subject. What's unclear? No one is interested to read about the history of NATO in the article titled Moldova and NATO. `'Miikka 19:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, got the idea. I will focus only on the Moldova and NATO.--Tones benefit 19:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Budapest

[edit]

Please don't add various pieces that are not directly related to the topic of the article. `'Miikka 19:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Ursul pacalit de vulpe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Belovedfreak 12:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Second block

[edit]

This is your second block for revert wars. If you continue your disruptive editing, you will be blocked indefinitely. `'Miikka 16:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you wanted to block me, that's so obvious but you don't know how to count. It's not 3 revert war. I ask you to show me where are the 3 ones?--Tones benefit 16:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is only 3 times http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_Moldova&curid=19249&action=history --Tones benefit 16:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't repair your mistaked someone else will and you'll be sorry for that. I wait your appologies.--Tones benefit 16:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once more: stay away from edit conflicts, or you will be banned from wikipedia for disruptive editing. `'Miikka 16:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I will wait but after that I will report you. You'll be sorry for this.--Tones benefit 16:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The guy only has three reverts [1] SosoMK 20:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ursul pacalit de vulpe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mr. Mikka, please unblock: that's just wrong because he only had three reverts

Decline reason:

The issue is not crossing the three revert rule line, it is continued disruptive editing. 2 days is not long ... cool off, and see if you can think of more productive ways to contribute to wikipedia — Pastordavid 20:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I reported Mikka's behavior on WP:ANI

[edit]

I suggest you stay cool and calm down. It's never a good idea to systematically revert all by yourself. In the future, try to build up some consensus on talk pages. However, I find the actions of Mikkalai rather arbitrary, so I reported him. Dpotop 17:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh..ok, I rather wish to concentrate now on Moldova's union with Romania. I've seen Alaexis is trying to catch me and after that Miika to block me for edit warring.--Tones benefit 17:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

last warning

[edit]

One more revert war like this, and you will be blocked from editin indefinitely. `'Miikka 17:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block escalation

[edit]

You are blocked for 1 week for disruption of wikipedia by repeatedly jumping into the revert war in an article with serious edit conflict, Georgia (country). `'Miikka 18:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ursul pacalit de vulpe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Block is legit, please wait the remaining 6 days of your block. — ^demon[omg plz] 19:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I ask admins to unblock me taking into consideration the followings: 1) you can see from my contributions that today I wanted to help a person (User:Sosomk) who was blocked illegally and in a discriminating way [2], I posted the Discrimination act done by Admin Miikka against the Sosomk editor on [3], 2) there is a conflict of interest between this admin and the way he acts on articles, he block us, and he reverts our work, see [4]. I ask admin, as another editor, Dpotop started on WP:ANI an investigation against the admin that blocked me: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=142872489#User:Mikkalai_uses_admin_power_in_content_disputes_against_User:Tones_benefit "User:Mikkalai uses admin power in content disputes against User:Tones benefit", and as Admin Luna Satin said, that's a clear example of conflict interest.--Tones benefit 18:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have several questions:

--Tones benefit 18:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For my case and User:Sosomk's it's a clear case of WP:DISPUTE as it was suggested by others.

Note: This user is a suspected sockpuppet of banned user:Bonaparte who is engaged in the typical pattern of revert warring and inciting hatred between editors of different nationalities. `'Miikka 19:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, User:Sosomk had a perfectly valid WP:3RR block. I have ploughed through the edits. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've answered you here. :Dc76 21:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ursul_pacalit_de_vulpe/archive1&oldid=1184725928"