User talk:UrbExa

Welcome!

Hello, UrbExa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TSS Duke of Lancaster (1955)

Hello, I'm Blue Riband. Thank your for your efforts at TSS Duke of Lancaster (1955). Being a new editor at Wikipedia can be overwhelming because there is a lot to learn. I want you to know why some of your edits had been reverted by another editor, and why I tagged your citations about the concrete barges as "Better Source Needed".

When we add information to an article we're expected to cite a reliable source (WP:RS) to back up that information. What exactly is a "reliable source"? In general it's one that has a good reputation for 1) fact-checking and 2) editorial oversight. Blog are not generally reliable sources because they are self-published by somebody who may - or may not - have any expertise in that field. Nobody is providing any editorial oversight. Details here: WP:BLOG.

Another editor removed your text that had cited the The Sun. That's because The Sun has a poor reputation for reliable reporting (WP:THESUN). Here is a long list of sources that editors often use, and you'll see that while some are considered reliable others are considered so bad that they can't be used at all: WP:RSP. (I'd like to make an update on the Romandisea Titanic article but the latest news was in the The Sun and Daily Mirror - two unreliable tabloids. Therefore I cannot state that it's abandoned and rusting until a better and more reliable source can be found.) Blue Riband► 04:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Dragon Lives Again, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]