User talk:Unmeshsphalak
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Unmeshsphalak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not using any kind of Open proxy. So please unblock me so that I can edit articles on wiki as a part of Wiki India Education programme.
Decline reason:
You'll need to use the unblock instructions provided when you attempt to edit. Please also verify that your editing in the future does not violate WP:NPOV and WP:COI (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
September 2011
[edit]Your addition to Data flow diagram has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Falcon8765 (TALK) 05:05, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Data flow diagram. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)- Please do not place unblock requests on other editor's pages. Clearly you are no longer blocked. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia following policy, and you should review the links in the Welcome message at the top of this very page (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Some falafel for you!
[edit]:) VJThomas (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Context.png
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Context.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYellerTalktome 14:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You may not add copied material anywhere on Wikipedia, sandbox included. Danger (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Context.png
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Context.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NW (Talk) 02:19, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Level1.png missing description details
[edit]If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:11, 24 November 2011 (UTC)File:Datastore.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Datastore.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Dataflow.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dataflow.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
The file File:Process 2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- orphaned file with no usability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)