User talk:Unknowledge

Your disruptive editing

Since this is the second time you have been reverted over this edit.[1] I would suggest you take your concerns to the talk page. Continued disruptive editing(removal of referenced information, removal of references, etc) can result in a block or ban. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas BearI think there is no vandalism that you can warn me.It is only a discussion.You can take my changes back and we we will discuss about this subject... Unknowledge (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You changed a number, but the source cited does not support that number. agtx 03:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agtx I am a TURKISH as you see in my user page.Some of these CIA informations are wrong.I am putting a reference supporting my change.ThanksUnknowledge (talk) 03:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not edit war!There is an discussion about that page so we can put a template.Do not teach me rules, I know them.You are complete disruptive anyway.Kansas Bear

Unknowledge (talk) 12:50, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can remain discussion in talk page instead of this approach and the template must be exist until there is compromise.

Unknowledge (talk) 13:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for edit warring

See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Unknowledge. While we all have our personal biases, we must strive to leave these out of our editing here entirely. The content of articles is only appropriate if it can be verified with reliable sources. Reviewing your editing, it looks like you are here to insert your own point of view into Wikipedia and not to contribute cited and verifiable material to the project. This can only hurt Wikipedia we do not allow that sort of behavior here. As I have determined you are not here to build the encyclopedia, I have blocked your account indefinitely. If you want to contribute, you're going to have to read the policies I've linked above and convince us you're willing and able to abide by them. Once you have done so, you may appeal this block, and you should read the guide to appealing blocks with information and advice on this process. Regards, Swarm ♠ 00:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drnsr, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked in English Wikipedia several years ago. I am a reviewer and a contributor in Turkish Wikipedia and I also want to make contributions to English Wikipedia. I know the rules and policies so I do not repeat the same mistake. Thanks in advance for your interest. Unknowledge (talk) 02:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]