User talk:Universal Hero/Archive 2

I have 2 exams on the morning of the first show and 7 exams on the week after!

Exams aren't an excuse. Go see it on the first day. The crowd will be AMAZING. I've been looking at the Rajinifans Yahoo group and all the stills in India. So far all the tickets up to the 23 are booked in Chennai, the 15th to 17th tickets were sold within seconds of the ticket office opening. US Sivaji tickets are also sold out for the first weekend. North England tickets are sold out until Tuesday, they are opening up multiple screens to allow more tickets to be sold. I would assume that is the same for London Cineworlds. This is a ONCE IN A LIFETIME opportunity.

~~ AVTN ^{T C}_{V A} 19:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cineworld ilford ruined the movie!

The sound sucked. Only the front speakers were on and there was no bass.

But the movie was 10/10 nonetheless. I am going to watch it again in Harrow Safari or a different NON-cineworld cinema next week. Thalaivar is the best!

I got all my answers to what I should do from the film!

AVTN 14:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I won't forget the article. But have you seen the film? (PS: WTF my sig won't work. It is limited and won't allow html span tags for adding colour...)AVTN 15:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think another Sivaji can come for another 20 years. AVTN 15:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sivaji: The Boss

Hi! Sorry if I offended you in anyway. However, I had noticed that the article was too voluminous. It contains too much of speculated, rumoured information. I was simply trying to go by the guidelines posted in the talk page of the article. I'm really sorry if any of my edits were out of place.

These were a few pointers that I was trying to focus on:

Copyediting, style and grammar - some of the sentences were overtly long and difficult to understand.
I created the listing for the cast since it was suggested on the talk page (I checked out the article for Casino Royale and tried to model it after that - but since I knew nothing about the roles played by the various actors, I assumed that if I made the simple list, then others could expand each actor's bit :) )
Reducing the soundtrack section to the suggested three paragraphs (wasn't able to complete this though :D )
Removing content which was irrelevant to the nature of the movie

From my point of view (and in my defense) I really was only trying to help reduce the size of the article. Maybe if we move all the rumours, speculation and other issues related to the movie to a separate article - that might help, then?

Once again I'm sincerely sorry. Just didn't realise that my edits were harmful. Please feel free to reply to me on my talk page. I will refrain from editing the Sivaji article page until we come to an agreement on the edits that I've done. --- aJCfreak yAk 17:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I'm actually gonna be logging out sometime soon. If necessary, I wouldn't mind discussing each paragraph with you and coming to a consensus - tomorrow.

Ummm. Was just going through the reverts that you've done and realised that you've not "blanket" reverted all my edits. Thanks. Secondly, just realised that I made my last edit AFTER all your reverts and your warning. This was a freak case cos I'd left the editing page open and had gone to get dinner, within which time you'd edited the article and left the message on my talk page. Please revert the last edit, if necessary. I'd be happier if we could discuss the changes required to cleanup the article across talk pages and reach a consensus to work together. Anyways, it's your call now. Happy wiki-ing, all the same! aJCfreak yAk 18:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry to bother you again, but I just thought I'd let you know that I'm trying to get the Image:73417053 9cf7fb3494 o.jpg image renamed and tagged with the appropriate license. aJCfreak yAk 18:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

Since the Sivaji article is in my watchlist, I couldn't help but notice that all of the images in the article have been removed stating that they violate copyrights. I've already included the necessary fair-use tags and the sources to Image:2005112908090201.jpg and Image:Sivaji firstday.jpg.
If you could simply add the source (and change the fair-use template to the correct one, if necessary) to the following images, then we could re-include the images to the article. Else, the images will be deleted pretty soon.

I could do it myself, but I do not know the source from where you/AVTN obtained the images.

If required, please check out copyright tags and the image use policy for complete information what tags to use and the like. Sure hope we can settle these images so that we could include them in the article again. -- aJCfreak yAk 07:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the recent edits to the article, I really feel that the editors are trying to add value to the article. If we look at the whole article from an objective POV, (and also considering that we want the article to get a GA rating, if not an FA in the not-too-distant future) some of their edits were necessary. The points that really stand out are:

Reliable sources for references. According to WP guidelines, we can't use blogs and we definitely can't use YT videos. We need to work on that.
Copyediting, style and grammar. Seriously, we need to majorly work on this bit - else the article will get only a B-rating when we nominate it for peer review.
Lengthy. The article is too long. I know that we have a LOT of info about the movie that we could include in the article, but if we could tone it down to only what is necessary and keeping in tone with the movie, then I believe we could reduce the size. Also, we might discuss the possibility of splitting the whole thing into smaller articles.

Finally, I'm slightly confused by the two messages you left on my talk page (the second one replacing the first). You first mentioned that you're not happy with what I did with the photos. Please lemme know what exactly I did wrong. All I remember is trying to re-align the pictures in the article according to Wikipedia's Image usage guidelines. I also renamed a photo and tagged it with the appropriate licensing/sourcing information.
You've then replaced that message saying we need to stop them. Does this mean that I can be involved with the Sivaji project again? Please let me know. I won't touch the page until you're completely happy with my intentions/edits/explanations. Till then, happy Wiki-ing! aJCfreak yAk 11:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji: The Boss

I don't believe there were mass changes being made to the page. Please read WP:OWN. People are going to be edit the article, so your best bet is to discuss on the talk page if you think someone is making an incorrect edit. Please don't just revert everyone's additions, and then re-insert them manually, since that is just wasting time. Also, it seems like you added back all the changes I had initially made to the article. Thanks, and keep up the good work on the article. Nishkid64 (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the referencing situation at Talk:Sivaji: The Boss#Fight over references. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

I think we should wait since many indians view the article and many haven't seen the film yet in Tamil Nadu. I am part of the Rajini e-fans association and they have put a rule on thier group not to talk about the plot until 1 week after the release. So I think we should wait til thursday. Besides I am seeing the film again next wednesday and the saturday after that. AVTN 08:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna delete my account in a few months.

Well, it was fun. I'll tell you why one day (2008). I enjoyed making a massive amount of edits and helping the community and all. AVTN 14:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I probably won't use wikipedia to edit pages after July 2007. Don't worry I will come to talk to you and stuff. I am getting a name change in preparation for my Right to Vanish! AVTN 15:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji: The Boss GA

See [1]. It's the wrong place, and I don't think it's ready yet. The reason why it failed last time was because it is unstable. It still is, and we also need to work on the plot before submitting a GAC. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2005112908090201.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2005112908090201.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 21:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Sivajispianshoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sivajispianshoot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sivaji-05.jpg

Look here: User talk:AVTN#Image_tagging_for_Image:Sivaji-05.jpg

You need to update your tag for Image:Sivaji-05.jpg!

AVTN 12:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji (film) has undergone lots of changes!

Come check it out and see if you need to do a bit. Check the talk page for the to do list, ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balleilakka

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Balleilakka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Style (2007 song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Style (2007 song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vaaji Vaaji

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Vaaji Vaaji, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sahana (song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Sahana (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sahara (song)

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Sahara (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 11:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again!

Hey, dunno whether you've noticed, but quite a few changes have been made to the Sivaji article. AVTN has even started a news template going to post on talk pages of valuable and major contributors such as yourself. I'm posting the template here:

User:AVTN/Sivaji

The template will keep updating with the news as and when stuff happens with the article. News items can be added by simply clicking the edit link in the template's title bar. Happy Wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 13:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the template... ~~ AVTN ^Talk 15:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Songs?

Well, if you think so. But the song articles are VERY bad. >_>

You should do some work on them. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 17:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All I did was summarize the soundtrack section.

And do some proding, I only proded it since I thought you might want it. aJCfreak agreed.

Discussions are made on the talk page before major changes

I agree, I have spoken of all my changed on the talk page.

People accept that Behindwoods.com is actually a fair source and official - sponsoring many tamil films.

I didn't say it wasn't a fair source. Its just the others thought it wasn't.

The unneeded tags on the article are removed

Was by that new guy User: Sarvagnya.

Anonymous/new editora re restricted from editing.

Just revert them.

I really think we need to take this issue to tha Wikipedia council or something. The place where they solve issues. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 18:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEY, Don't forget I put a lot of work, not as much as you, but still a lot into that article.~~ AVTN ^Talk 18:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really do think we need to take this up to the council or Wikipedia or whatever its called. AND YOU NEED TO ARCHIVE this talk page. ~~ AVTN ^Talk 18:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Please have a look at WP:OWN. Thanks, Gnanapiti 19:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See, first of all I don't have time and patience for all your non sense. If you had read the link that I've provided, you would not have replied back with same words. The fact that you haven't read the policy proves the point that neither you are interested in making wiki a better project, nor you have sense and brains to discuss with other editors. If you don't want to edit any article, don't edit, that's it. The world is not going to end. But please stop spamming talk pages with your gibberish. Gnanapiti 19:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You

This is you, isn't it? Gnanapiti 17:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Likely. Time for a usercheck.Anwar 17:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well my time here will soon be up.

I'll be gone as soon as I change all the references to my name. It was good knowing you. All the best with the Sivaji article.~~ AVTN ^Talk 19:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji

I think your article on sivaji is light years ahead of the current article. Please change the current page and nominate the article for GA. Also, to let you know - there are GA articles without pics/images. --Kalyan 03:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why you have not updated the Sivaji page with the contents on your userpage? --Kalyan 08:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK ... put the content and we shall face whatever they throw at us. --Kalyan 16:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please upload the images and ensure that they are properly tagged. Thanks. --Kalyan 18:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji

Nice work on the humungous amount of good data on Sivaji. You should probably spend more time cpediting and trimming out some fringe details to make this an FA. Good luck. Lotlil 17:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently working on a couple of other articles, so I may not be able to contribute heavily. But I see that the article is in good hands now. Kalyan and you should be able to bring it to stability. I do want to point out that some of the sources may be considered non-RS. The talk page to-do box lists behindwoods.com as non-RS. Then there's kollywoodtoday.com and a few other web sites that look fishy to me. I suggest you try and establish their reliability or find alternate sources for the information that you want to ascribe to them. Or may be start a thread on the talk page listing out all your sources and ask for opinions from people as to what can be considered RS etc. Lotlil 22:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments at Vimalkalyan's talk page

Regarding [2], please be aware that we were only improving the article. There were a number of false references that did not corroborate with the text they were placed next to. Also, a number of sources did not meet WP:RS, which is Wikipedia policy. There were many flow issues in the article, and all I did was clean it up. Please don't treat the page as your "own" article. This is Wikipedia, and everything we do here is a collaboration. Also, in regards to [3], please remove the scroll box. In accordance with [4], the scroll format for references shouldn't be used for Wikipedia articles because not every reference will show up in the hard copy of the article. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The day is coming soon.

I will soon depart. You know my e-mail address right? It was fun being on wikipedia. I'll be asking you a favour in the near future. I'll be needing you to write a new article. AVTN 20:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji (pre-production)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sivaji (pre-production), by Anwar saadat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sivaji (pre-production) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

spam. Contains duplicate and trivia already available at Sivaji:_The_Boss

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sivaji (pre-production), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam

Please stop link spamming (121 links) like this. Almost all the links are duplicates referring the same source. Also, consider reading Wikipedia policy on burden of proof. Whenever you add content to Wikipedia, please cite source. Don't tell other editors to give proof why your content ought not to be added. Anwar 15:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji (film)

i know but give me a day before i re-introduce most of this content by this time tomorrow --Kalyan 18:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but please ensure that you bring in data which is sourced from non-gossip websites. I have an idea for the acceptability of data that people might contest otherwise and hence please don't introduce any non-controversial data. Also, focus on the all-round elements of the movie (like skin grafting ; usage of ballon lighting etc). --Kalyan 11:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the data you have added does not meet our requirements. Give me atleast 12 hours and i shall clean-up these sections to more encyclopedic content (For Eg: battle with Dasavatharam is more gossip in nature than encyclopedic! If it needs to stay - the info needs to come from mainline news agencies rather than gossip websites). --Kalyan 11:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a request - please don't modify any data that i add/change without letting me know. i find it frustrating that i edit a section and a few hours later, you have modified it back to a different data. Let us discuss before we keep undoing each others work. Case in point - the lead section talks of the estimated budget being 70 to 96 crores, based on estimates from various sources and articles and i find that you have changed that data. I am reverting back to 70 to 96 crores and if you have a good reason to change it, discuss it either in the talk page or leave me a note and after we discuss and agree, you can implement the changes. that way, we are not stepping on each other's toes. --Kalyan 15:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

For the goodbye. Well, I'll be off then. I just come here to talk to people a bit now. ^_^ AVTN 15:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sivaji - why the changes?

Cast comes before plot. unless you know who'z part of the cast, how can you explain the plot
Wikilink in plot section. please read Wikipedia's Manual of Style. You should avoid wiki-linking any article more than once. Since rajini, shriya, suman and every of the cast is wikilinked in the lead para, you need not wikilink once again
I am revert back the lead para to what i wrote. please don't change it unless you can explain each of the changes

in the current form, this article will never make GA or FA. please let me know what is important to you - sticking to your stance about the article or getting this to GA/FA? --Kalyan 15:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sivaji

Boss, I thought you guys were making progress... why did you have to add all of those sections again, without cleaning them up first ? I think you should revert back to Kalyan's last version before you made those additions, then clean up one section at a time in your sandbox or somewhere.. and then add it to the article. The way it is right now, the article is only inviting a whole bunch of tags. And, one more thing: when you replaced the lead portion with your own version, you removed some citations which were also being referred elsewhere. Those are all gone now, which is why Gnanapiti is questioning many claims in the box-office section. Lotlil 04:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to New Seven Wonders of the World

While I have no doubt that you meant well, I reverted your edit to New Seven Wonders of the World, as making changes to direct quotes is generally viewed as being bad form. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Suman (actor)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Suman (actor), by Scarian (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Suman (actor) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Suman (actor), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category, Infobox, and Script Removals

Hello Universal Hero. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Recently, I have noted that you have removed a large amount of Urdu scripts and categories from Bollywood film articles. I am sure you were not aware that this issue was discussed in length here, among other places and it was decided that Urdu scripts etc. are indeed relevant in Bollywood film articles. It is helpful to understand the relationship between Hindi-Urdu and Bollywood when dealing with this subject area. Several Bollywood film covers that utilize Indian scripts give the two standard registers of Hindustani: Hindi and Urdu. You can take a look at some of these film covers yourself: Image:Awaaraposter.jpg, Image:Waqt 1965 film poster.JPG, Image:Sholayposter2.jpg, Image:Padosan film poster.jpg, etc. Other reasons are provided in the archives of Talk:Bollywood. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in the matter. With regards, Anupam^Talk 00:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Universal Hero. Yes, speakers of North Indian (Indo-Aryan) languages probably have a better understanding of Bollywood films because their languages are all based on Sanskrit, from which Hindi/Urdu developed. The language of Bollywood movies can be called both Hindi or Urdu. Perhaps the A Little About Language section in this article will give some insight on the entire situation. Please also see this article, which also addresses the usage of both Hindi and Urdu scripts in Bollywood film articles. There is a section in the Bollywood article which contains a section on Asia. Please feel free to edit the article as you see fit. I hope this helps! Thanks again for your reply. With regards, Anupam^Talk 16:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid redirect

A tag has been placed on Balaji Shaktivel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Russ (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Raghav Ranganathan

Raghav Ranganathan, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Raghav Ranganathan satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghav Ranganathan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Raghav Ranganathan during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rackabello 20:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

This image Image:AVMstudios.jpg appears to be a blatant copy from here [5] yet you claim you took the photo. Can you explain. GameKeeper 21:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have now nominated this image for deletion. Do you acknowledge that you uploaded a copyrighted photo and falsified the copyright information? You said "Image taken by myself of the AVM studios situated in Vadapalani, Chennai", which appears to be an intentional deception. On a separate note I see that you think my account is a sockpuppet. I would encourage you to file a case against anyone you think is a sockpuppet. The details of how to do this are here Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. I would not take any offense if a report was filed against me and no offense is intended when I filed one against you. This is just a procedure to ensure wikipedia is not being vandalized. If you require any help with this I would be happy to answer any questions having just completed the procedure myself. GameKeeper 11:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have still not explained why you intentionally entered incorrect copyright information. I am oblidged to issue this warning GameKeeper 11:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Universal Hero for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

R. Madhavan

In this diff you reverted my edits. You can disagree and it's OK (although I think you had to discuss it and respect the fact that I'm a user like you are). The only thing now is that you removed the MOSLOW tag. Please don't remove it until the films will be ordered in chronological order. If you are not aware of this, stick to the page indicated in the tag. I usually immediately correct tables when I see thse problems and you can see that in my edits, but I'm busy now.

An example:

film (2006)
film (2005)
film (2004)

The right way to list the films is:

film (2004)
film (2005)
film (2006)

Regards, --Shahid • ^Talk2me 23:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, in the page, it's written more than once that Madhavan was nominated for the National Film Awards. Do you have a proof/ref indicating so? --Shahid • ^Talk2me 23:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Of course, I ADORE him, I've seen his films and he's one of the best, undoubtedly. He is now set to star with my favorite - Preity Zinta in a film and it's great. Thanks for the compliment regarding my user page. As per the MOSLOW, I will do it myself now. My best regards, --Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only site where you can find free images is flickr.com. I will look for. --Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh that's the same thing I'm trying to do with Preity Zinta's page. --Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just came back from India...

And, I'm coming back to Wikipedia. Although not editing as much as at my peak, I will edit quite a bit. I see your having some problems of your own now? AVTN 19:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latest update

Do you have a more fantastic story to explain the latest updates here User_talk:GameKeeper#Apologies? GameKeeper 19:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects

Hi, could you fix the double redirects you've created when moving Satyam (2008 film) please. Cheers. Nick 13:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Champions League 2007-08

This article is currently in use. Please do not edit it. - PeeJay 16:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked nicely not to edit it while it is in use. Next time, you will be reported to an admin. - PeeJay 16:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to report the results of the draw accurately, using the clubs' correct names, nothing more. - PeeJay 16:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have only been blocked once. The other two times were a block of a shared IP, as I was at uni. Don't make assumptions. - PeeJay 16:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel I must apologise for my attitude just now. I should have assumed good faith, but the moment got away from me. I apologise. - PeeJay 17:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article

which article are you speaking about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddyr (talk • contribs) 05:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha...hey.... i am not the actor.... our names match...thats all —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddyr (talk • contribs) 09:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Veerappu

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Veerappu, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://pstl.in/tamil3.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 11:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References.

Please read WP:V before changing an article to contradict it's cited source like you did at [6]. -- Jeandré, 2007-09-12t20:47z

image correction of copyright notice

Image:Madhavan debut.jpg has a copyright section taken as you say from Image:Chopper-Bana.jpg. But Image:Madhavan debut.jpg has not been cropped down it is 1024x768 pixels, so

3 The screenshot has been cropped, and is of lower resolution than the original film (copies made from it will be of inferior quality).

is not true. Can you crop this picture and can you confirm the other copyright info is correct. In particular

2 The image is a screenshot from a promotional film trailer and intended for wide distribution.

, and you might want to correct

5 No free or public domain images have been located for this actress or this film.

too . GameKeeper 09:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]