User talk:Unionsoap

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Azviz (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Unionsoap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DreamGuy (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Tooheys 1000

Unreferenced? There are quite a lot of references, I think the template you want to use there is the one that states a lack of in-line citations. I suggest you should substitute it. --Falcadore (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I have located the suggested template and have substituted it on the article. Unionsoap (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Need to detail your original research issues too though. Refer Talk:1992 Tooheys 1000 --Falcadore (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Carina Axelsson

No, if you read Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use before, you did not need to question about it.

Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images.

--Caspian blue 01:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Banner format

?! You borrow my banner format and content. :D --Caspian blue 01:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I modified it. Do you mind? (Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery).Unionsoap (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not mind (and flattered with a little surprise)--Caspian blue 01:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me with the formating so the top message will appear in a box like yours. I do not know why the colour is through out. Thx. Unionsoap (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Caspian blue 02:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU!Unionsoap (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verification

I prodded this as lacking verification from secondary sources. You deprodded. Can you verify it? Not much point in cleaning it up unless we verify it. [1].--Scott Mac (Doc) 08:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yvon d'Anjou is an award winning French Canadian artist. Most articles on him are published in French. Nonetheless, there are many references to him that can be found with just a google search. I have added some of these links, and have also given the article a significant re-write edit to address what appeared to be copyvio. This article should be kept as a stub. Unionsoap (talk) 13:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I am content not to pursue deletion.--Scott Mac (Doc) 13:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider Rockets

I closed a previous deletion discussion about this article as delete. However, it has come to my attention that some of the participants were sock puppets. In the circumstances, I would have relisted the discussion to achieve proper consensus had I discounted the sock !votes; I have now relisted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Rockets (2nd nomination) and am notifying you as you participated in the first discussion. Stifle (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for helping the article expand!! :) Batreeqah ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 00:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for helping the article expand!! :) Batreeqah ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 00:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 16:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]