User talk:Unforgiven24


Home	Talk	About Me	Awards	eMail	Subpages	Contributions	All Edits	Guest Book	Sandbox

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Unforgiven24}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1 (June 2008 - December 2008)

Wiki Project Metro Detroit

Hi, thanks for the note. I think it should be called Wikiproject Metro Detroit, since this would bring in more participation and provide better coverage, just Detroit is too limiting. It may not be necessary since Project Michigan appears to be sufficient. It would be a good idea to start a Metro Detroit Portal. ThanksThomas Paine1776 (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, sorry for the long delay here. So, I've never really done this - what's involved in starting a portal? I'd love to help out, but I've never worked on one or anything. Where do we begin? - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 16:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This sample can be created and then all the content would have to be filled in, which is what takes the time. As soon as I can get around to it I can help, unless you want to get a head start, the headings are flexible of course. Here is a sample to begin the Metro Detroit portal:Portal:San Francisco Bay Area

Well, I'm new to this, but I've started a quick thing in my sandbox to get the ball rolling, so to speak. I'm pretty busy for a little while (week or so) with non-wikipedia stuff, and my internet access is limited, so feel free to change/build/edit and so on on that. I think this is going to be fun. ;) - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 16:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Count me in on this. --Hansj102 17:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Good start on your sandbox for the Metro Detroit portal. There is a Michigan portal that may give you some ideas for the Metro Detroit portal: Portal:Michigan - Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 17:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Packer Storage

Hello,

I was wondering if you could submit the Mr. Packer Storage page original content to me so that I could edit the content to make it more"wikipedia friendly".

Thank you

Michael Casinovacrew (talk) 04:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to if I could, but I'm afraid I don't have it. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 04:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updates on Detroit Area Council

Why must you remove information about the Detroit Area Council on their page? If you have no idea what "Marsh madness" why do you remove it? It is a program that can not be explained, you have to experience it!!!

Also, yes D-bar-A can be pristine and untouched, and still be there. It is a saying, that we know it is there, but we have not developed the land for use.

For someone that does not go to D-bar-A Scout Ranch, or Cole Canoe Base, you sure an "know-it-all" about the camps.

Firstly, it's not about what you or I know, it's about what can be verified and referenced. This is Wikipedia, not an advertisement, and the content has to be from a neutral point of view. It doesn't matter if I'm an eagle scout and I've been to D-A more times than I can count (granted, not in a few years) and Cole several times - that'd be basing an article on original research.

Secondly, regarding Marsh Madness specifically - as I said (in some variation or other) in the edit summary, there's little reason to have a a section in an article that entirely consists of a sentence or telling the reader that the subject cannot be explained. Saying that sounds like an advertisement - an attempt to draw the reader in to investigate for themselves what it's about. That isn't, however, what wikipedia is about.

Lastly, please don't take it so personally. I edited an article, not you. There's a beautiful little notice at the end of the edit page that says "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it". It's very true.

Also, if you'd like to keep discussing this, please do so on the article's talk page so everyone that edits there can participate. Signing your posts by typing ~~~~ after them also makes things easier to follow.

I look forward to editing with you. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 22:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wyandotte, Michigan "ballers"

It looks like it's all the same person, but only now do any of those accounts have a level 3 warning. I'll watch the page, but if they do it again and I miss it, let me know and I'll block the account (and the previous ones). Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, I appreciate the help. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 18:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your talk page warning question

Annoyingly, people are usually allowed to remove what they want from their talk page. Luckily the blanking can be seen as a sign they're aware of the warnings. Some of his vandalism is a month old. If he continues with fresh vandalism, my advice would be to report him, but he has to have sufficient warnings. The warnings escalate in seriousness. Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace -if he acts again give him a 3rd, if again, a forth level warning, which is a 'last warning'. Then report him to to WP:AIV. You might well know all that about warnings/reporting etc.:) This is pretty much a vandalism-only account. He doesn't have many contribs, so people might well check in his contribs if he removes a warning of theirs, to see if he's done it before. I see your point, and others have warred over pages where people are doing it before, but unfortunately the person whose page it is is usually allowed to do it. It may be different if it's an IP address rather than a registered user, but it would perhaps still need some new acts/warnings before reporting. This is not my specialist subject, so the norms involving warnings etc. might not be quite as strict as this, but hope my suggestions help.:)Sticky Parkin 15:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Zishan Engineers

An article that you have been involved in editing, Zishan Engineers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zishan Engineers. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beagel (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax indeed

The use of "chit" meaning a bit of paper is well established - see wiktionary:en:chit. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you're right. I genuinely apologize. I've heard the word used as a alternate form of "shit", so at the time it seemed an obvious troll. I'm sorry I judged too quickly. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 20:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you upload pictures on Wikipedia

Hello:

I just started up here and was wondering how I can upload photo's on wikipedia.

Thanks

Tim Charlet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim5636sc (talk • contribs) 22:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians' reputations

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Survey taken. Sounds like some interesting work going on there. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 02:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pragmatic buddhism

Hello

Just to mention that I recently added to the discussion on the above page

Frank Walsh (1962) (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit task force proposal!

Hi! I heard that you are planning a Detroit portal. I proposed a Detroit task force on the WikiProject Michigan talk page. Thomas Paine pointed out that you were developing a Detroit portal. Why not make the Detroit portral one of the projects of a Detroit task force? WhisperToMe (talk) 04:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me. I haven't actually worked on it in a while, and I'll be first to say that I'm really just figuring it out as I go along, though. Feel free to have at it a bit, and now that there's some other interest in it, I'll try and work on it again, too. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 14:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to help tag all of the articles within the scope of the Detroit task force. That way everyone will know which articles are covered by the task force. In addition the portal will be a part of the task force. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to interest from other users, I started the task force page here Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan/Detroit WhisperToMe (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Detroit portal

I just looked at the Detroit Portal in your sandbox. I can only see the left half without scrolling. I presume this is some sort of error. I am using IE version 8 if that makes a difference. 75.41.110.200 (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind if I move User:Unforgiven24/Sandbox/Portal:Metro Detroit to Portal:Detroit into the portal space now? I want to get the portal out and start linking to it from many Detroit-related articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free. Sorry I'm not on here as much as I used to be. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 00:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We've begun placing the content in the actual Portal:Metro Detroit in an easy to use format. Check it out. Thanks.Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hi Unfy, nice to hear from you! Hope you've been keeping well, what've you been upto? Sticky Parkin 10:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Work, etc. Nothing terribly notable I suppose. Good to see you still around, though. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 14:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vito Campanella

A tag has been placed on Vito Campanella, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copy paste from http://www.campanellavito.com/ingles/bio.htm hardly any improvements since 2008

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. gidonb (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you put the warnings 3 years ago I thaught you may want a notice about this procedure. Thanks for your assistance at the time! gidonb (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, I appreciate it. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 20:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Unforgiven24! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey done, thanks. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 16:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supremes, LLC

Hello,

The page was tagged for deletion however I'm not sure why it was. Please advise thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimasupremes (talk • contribs) 04:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The reason given at the time was No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content). - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 16:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

why did you delete Yellow Dubmarine?

the page was created using existing formats for band pages that are in existence? they are traveling the country and people want to know about them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchorney (talk • contribs) 20:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a small clarification, I didn't delete it, I only tagged it - someone else would have to actually delete it. I tagged it for the reason it said - it was very advertising-sounding. Wikipedia tries to keep a tone of neutrality in its articles. I'm sure you love the band, but everything should try to be neutral, and since the article was overwhelmingly non-neutral, it would have to be re-written.

If you'd like to re-do the article in your sandbox, I'd be happy to look it over and make suggestions, if that would help. Just make sure it also meets the guidelines for notability for music.

- Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 21:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yellow Dubmarine

I just re edited the page http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Yellow_dubmarine

thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchorney (talk • contribs) 20:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely looks better. Good luck with it! Editing wikipages is an addicting activity. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of • Fredrick Williams

A tag has been placed on • Fredrick Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jared Preston (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello and thank you for the cat :-) it was a very ice cat

A kitten for you!

it is a very cute kitten

Roxyrockz (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's very nice of you. I promise to feed him. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 20:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Pilling

Hello Wiki-staff.

Steve Pilling is an important person in Manchester. He's won several top restaurant awards and is highly regarded amongst chefs and owners alike. Please keep his page up as his page is a christmas present to him from many of his apprentice chefs. We've all taken it to ourselves to create his page so he has more publicity as well as a known legacy. If actresses can have a wiki page, why can't a highly reknown restaurant owner have one as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrinityDamson (talk • contribs) 14:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Notability guidelines can be found in Wikipedia:Notability_(people). I'm far from perfect, if you read through that and still think I was wrong to tag the page for Speedy Deletion, create it again and I won't tag it again, though if someone else does, I'd take that as a strong indicator. Wikipedia entries aren't meant to be Christmas gifts. - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 15:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit to "The Purple Gang" page. (Eminem Lyrics)

Hi Unforgiven24,

Max here, 
 Just wanted to let you know that the edits you made to "The Purple Gang" wiki seem 'all good' to me..
  There was just too much detail, as you'd mentioned, and it now looks tidy and is very readable. 
   You shortened it up nicely, and the important information still remains. Cool.

  and of course,
   thank you..
                                                 
 Obviously I couldn't have done better myself.. (``)_
                                                [^_^]
Regards, from                                    -|-
 Canada.                                         / \

Maxchillin (talk) 10:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article you edited on Testoril

I am currently reviewing this article and I have seen that you made an edit to it. I am recommending that it be flagged for speedy deletion because it reads like an advertisment. Contact me if you have any comments.

bpage (talk) 01:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: New helper policy

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)}[reply]

Reasong of Patrolling the page Baha Lake

What were the reasons that you patrolled the page of Baha Lake. Its a beautiful water reservoir and a charming tourist spot.Khesrawkakakhail (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right, and the article looks fine. Marking it patrolled just means someone looked at it and thinks it looked fine, not that there's something wrong with it. :) - Unforgiven24 ^Talk|_Contribs 18:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Unforgiven24,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unforgiven24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!